Rowe v. Google LLC
Filing
294
ORDER granting 293 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application GRANTED. Defendant shall file any motion related to Plaintiff's expert reports by February 3, 2023. Plaintiff shall file any opposition by February 10, 2023. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/18/2023) (tg)
Case 1:19-cv-08655-LGS Document 294 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 1
Application GRANTED. Defendant shall file any motion related to
Plaintiff's expert reports by February 3, 2023. Plaintiff shall file any
opposition by February 10, 2023. So Ordered.
1(212) 318-6046
kennethgage@paulhastings.com
Dated: January 18, 2023
New York, New York
January 18, 2023
VIA ECF
Hon. Lorna G. Schofield
U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y.
Re:
Ulku Rowe v. Google LLC, Case No. 1:19-cv-08655-LGS
Dear Judge Schofield:
We represent Google LLC (“Google”) in this matter. Pursuant to Rule I(B)(2) of Your Honor’s Individual
Rules and Procedures, the parties jointly request an extension of the deadlines for Google to file a motion
related to Plaintiff’s testifying expert, and for Plaintiff to oppose that motion. The current deadlines are
January 20 and January 27, 2023, respectively.
Google deposed Plaintiff’s expert, Nora Ostrofe, on January 11, 2023. During the deposition, Google
learned that Plaintiff’s expert expects to serve a supplemental report in the coming days. Google requests
that the deadline to file a motion related to Plaintiff’s testifying expert be extended to 14 days after the
supplemental report’s service. Plaintiff will have 7 days to oppose Google’s motion.
This is the parties’ second request for an extension of this schedule. The previous request was granted.
(ECF No. 287.) All parties consent to this request. We thank the Court for its consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
Kenneth W. Gage
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?