Rowe v. Google LLC

Filing 294

ORDER granting 293 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application GRANTED. Defendant shall file any motion related to Plaintiff's expert reports by February 3, 2023. Plaintiff shall file any opposition by February 10, 2023. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/18/2023) (tg)

Download PDF
Case 1:19-cv-08655-LGS Document 294 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 1 Application GRANTED. Defendant shall file any motion related to Plaintiff's expert reports by February 3, 2023. Plaintiff shall file any opposition by February 10, 2023. So Ordered. 1(212) 318-6046 kennethgage@paulhastings.com Dated: January 18, 2023 New York, New York January 18, 2023 VIA ECF Hon. Lorna G. Schofield U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. Re: Ulku Rowe v. Google LLC, Case No. 1:19-cv-08655-LGS Dear Judge Schofield: We represent Google LLC (“Google”) in this matter. Pursuant to Rule I(B)(2) of Your Honor’s Individual Rules and Procedures, the parties jointly request an extension of the deadlines for Google to file a motion related to Plaintiff’s testifying expert, and for Plaintiff to oppose that motion. The current deadlines are January 20 and January 27, 2023, respectively. Google deposed Plaintiff’s expert, Nora Ostrofe, on January 11, 2023. During the deposition, Google learned that Plaintiff’s expert expects to serve a supplemental report in the coming days. Google requests that the deadline to file a motion related to Plaintiff’s testifying expert be extended to 14 days after the supplemental report’s service. Plaintiff will have 7 days to oppose Google’s motion. This is the parties’ second request for an extension of this schedule. The previous request was granted. (ECF No. 287.) All parties consent to this request. We thank the Court for its consideration. Respectfully submitted, Kenneth W. Gage PAUL HASTINGS LLP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?