Canzoneri McCormick et al v. Microsoft et al

Filing 2

ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651. Plaintiff files this new pro se case and has not paid the filing fee or sought leave from the Court to bring this action. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the December 8, 2011 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this as a "written opinion" within the meaning of Section 205(a)(5) of the E-Government Act of 2002. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 10/2/2019) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JO ANNA CANZONERI McCORMICK, an
individual, et al.; JOHN DOES 1−1000; JANE
DOES 1−1000,
Plaintiffs,
-againstMICROSOFT, a business entity, et al.; JOHN
DOES 1−1000; JANE DOES 1−1000, inclusive

19-CV-9090 (LLS)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Defendants.
LOUIS L. STANTON, United States District Judge:
On December 8, 2011, Plaintiff Jo Anna Canzoneri McCormick was barred from filing
any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See
Canzoneri, et al., v. Tribune, et al., ECF 1:11-CV-6614, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2011). Plaintiff files
this new pro se case and has not paid the filing fee or sought leave from the Court to bring this
action. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with
the December 8, 2011 order.
The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this
order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket.
The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this as a “written opinion” within the meaning of
Section 205(a)(5) of the E-Government Act of 2002.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 2, 2019
New York, New York
Louis L. Stanton
U.S.D.J.