Torres et al. v. Sanchez et al.
Filing
39
ORDER. By Wednesday, May 26, 2021, Plaintiffs are directed to: (1) inform the Court whether Daniel German Zamora Avila in this action is the same person as Daniel Zamora in the 2014 Action, and if so (ii) explain why the amount of damages awarded in the 2014 Action should not be offset against any damages awarded to Daniel German Zamora Avila in this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 5/19/21) (yv)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
RAFAEL ACERO TORRES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
-v-
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 19 Civ. 9357 (GHW) (SLC)
JAIRO ENRIQUE SANCHEZ AND DILIA MARGARITA BAEZ,
ORDER
Defendants.
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This action has been referred to the undersigned to conduct a damages inquest following
the finding by the Honorable Gregory H. Woods that Defendants are liable for each of Plaintiffs’
asserted claims. (ECF Nos. 32–33). In reviewing Plaintiffs’ submissions regarding damages (ECF
Nos. 23–27), the Court observes that one of the Plaintiffs in this action, Daniel German Zamora
Avila, has a similar name as the Plaintiff in the matter captioned Daniel Zamora v. JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A., No. 14 Civ. 5344 (WHP) (SN) (S.D.N.Y.) (the “2014 Action”), in which a default
judgment in the amount of $9,724,843.11 was entered in favor of that Plaintiff against the same
Defendants as are named in this action.
Accordingly, by Wednesday, May 26, 2021, Plaintiffs are directed to: (1) inform the Court
whether Daniel German Zamora Avila in this action is the same person as Daniel Zamora in the
2014 Action, and if so (ii) explain why the amount of damages awarded in the 2014 Action should
not be offset against any damages awarded to Daniel German Zamora Avila in this action.
Dated:
New York, New York
May 19, 2021
SO ORDERED
_________________________
SARAH L. CAVE
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?