Eddystone Rail Company, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 89

ORDER: The Court has reviewed the parties' recent letters. (Docket # # 85, 86, 87). The Court wishes the parties to be aware that it appears to the Court that the parties have misconstrued the import of footnote 13 of Docket # 81. That footn ote does not make a ruling on the question of whether the protective order in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case should be modified in any fashion (for example, to allow plaintiff to use materials designated as confidential for purposes of d rafting an amended complaint). A conference to discuss this issue and any other matters raised in the parties' letters shall take place on November 22, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. At that date and time, the parties shall dial (888) 557-8511 and use acc ess code: 6642374. The Court will record the proceeding for purposes of transcription in the event a transcript is ordered. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Telephone Conference set for 11/22/2021 at 04:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 11/19/2021) (jca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X EDDYSTONE RAIL COMPANY, LLC : : ORDER : 19 Civ.9584 (GBD) (GWG) Plaintiffs, -v.: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. : Defendants. : ---------------------------------------------------------------X GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge The Court has reviewed the parties’ recent letters. (Docket # # 85, 86, 87). The Court wishes the parties to be aware that it appears to the Court that the parties have misconstrued the import of footnote 13 of Docket # 81. That footnote does not make a ruling on the question of whether the protective order in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case should be modified in any fashion (for example, to allow plaintiff to use materials designated as confidential for purposes of drafting an amended complaint). Nor does it commit this Court to issue such an order in the future. Indeed, it is the Court’s current view that the Eastern District of Pennsylvania is the only appropriate venue in which to make an application to allow the plaintiff to use material produced in Eastern District of Pennsylvania case without the restriction of the protective order in place there. A conference to discuss this issue and any other matters raised in the parties’ letters shall take place on November 22, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. At that date and time, the parties shall dial (888) 557-8511 and use access code: 6642374. (The public may also dial in but will be permitted only to listen.) When dialing in to the conference, the parties must be in a quiet indoor location and must not use a speakerphone. A telephone line and microphone technology with optimal quality should be used. The Court will record the proceeding for purposes of transcription in the event a transcript is ordered. However, any other recording or dissemination of the proceeding in any form is forbidden. Each attorney or unrepresented party is directed to ensure that all other attorneys or unrepresented parties on the case are aware of the oral argument date and time. In addition, any requests for an adjournment must be made in compliance with Judge Gorenstein’s rules (available https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-gabriel-w-gorenstein). SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2021 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?