Falberg v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. et al

Filing 257

***SELECTED PARTIES*** CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 256 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan Retirement Committee, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. against Leonid Falberg. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That f or the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated September 14, 2022, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Falberg's motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. In addition, Falberg's motion to c ompel documents designated as privileged and Defendants' motions to strike expert opinions and to compel arbitration of certain class members are DENIED as moot; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 9/15/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)

Download PDF
Case 1:19-cv-09910-ER Document 257 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X Leonid Falberg, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan, -against- Plaintiff, 19 CIVIL 9910 (ER) JUDGMENT The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan Retirement Committee, and John Does 120, Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated September 14, 2022, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Falberg's motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. In addition, Falberg's motion to compel documents designated as privileged and Defendants' motions to strike expert opinions and to compel arbitration of certain class members are DENIED as moot; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York September 15, 2022 RUBY J. KRAJICK _________________________ Clerk of Court BY: _________________________ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?