Farmer v. Indyke et al

Filing 120

ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. Nothing herein shall be construed to preclude Ms. Maxwell from seeking fees or costs related to this matter from the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Darren K. I ndyke, in his capacity as Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Richard D. Kahn, in his capacity as Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, or NES, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company, or release any such claims as between the D efendants. Nor does anything herein prejudice the Estate Of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Darren K. Indyke, in his capacity as Executor of the Estate Of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Richard D. Kahn, in his capacity as Executor of the Estate Of Jeffrey E. Epstein, or NES, LLCs rights and legal positions with respect to Ms. Maxwells seeking of fees or costs related to this matter, all of which rights and legal positions are hereby expressly preserved. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide Ms. Maxwe ll with a copy of the General Release, with the compensation amount redacted, within two days. The parties shall not dispute the authenticity of this copy of the General Release in any future proceedings. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 2/16/2021) (cf)

Download PDF
Case 1:19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF Document 120 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANNIE FARMER, Plaintiff, CASE NO: 19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN, and GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendants. _____________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER XXXXXXXX LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS Plaintiff submitted a claim for compensation to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program (“EVCP”) asserting that she was sexually abused by Jeffrey E. Epstein; and WHEREAS, after reviewing Plaintiff’s submissions and after careful consideration of documentation and proof, and after due deliberation, the EVCP Program Administrator (the “Administrator”) determined pursuant to the EVCP Protocol that Plaintiff was eligible to participate in the EVCP; WHEREAS Plaintiff has reached a confidential agreement, through which she will receive compensation from the EVCP in exchange for a release (the “General Release”); and WHEREAS the General Release contains the terms of the release. Case 1:19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF Document 120 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 2 It is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice,XwithX XX XeachXpartyXto bear its X X X attorneys’Xfees and X X X Nothing herein shall be construed to preclude X X X X X X x X X own X X X X X X X X X costs. Ms. Maxwell from seeking fees or costs related to this matter from the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Darren K. Indyke, in his capacity as Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Richard D. Kahn, in his capacity as Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, or NES, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company, or release any such claims as between the Defendants. Nor does anything herein prejudice the Estate Of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Darren K. Indyke, in his capacity as Executor of the Estate Of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Richard D. Kahn, in his capacity as Executor of the Estate Of Jeffrey E. Epstein, or NES, LLC’s rights and legal positions with respect to Ms. Maxwell’s seeking of fees or costs related to this matter, all of which rights and legal positions are hereby expressly preserved. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide Ms. Maxwell with a copy of the General Release, with the compensation amount redacted, within two days. The parties shall not dispute the authenticity of this copy of the General Release in any future proceedings. So Ordered. Dated: February 16, 2021 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?