Shukla v. Deloitte Consulting LLP

Filing 248

ORDER: The Court is in receipt of a letter from Defendant dated April 22, 2021 (ECF No. 247) requesting an adjournment of the telephone conference originally scheduled for April 29, 2021 (see Order, ECF No. 246, at 1) due to the unavailability of d efense counsel Greg Tabakman, Esq. Defendant states that it sought Plaintiff's consent but has had difficulty communicating with Plaintiff, who has been traveling abroad, apparently with intermittent internet access. The Court hereby ORDERS t hat the telephone conference originally scheduled for April 29, 2021 is adjourned sine die. No later than Tuesday, May 4, 2021, the parties shall file a joint letter providing three mutually available dates for that telephone conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 4/26/2021) (kl)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 4/26/2021 Ashu Shukla, Plaintiff, 1:19-cv-10578 (AJN) (SDA) -against- ORDER Deloitte Consulting LLP, Defendant. STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter from Defendant dated April 22, 2021 (ECF No. 247) requesting an adjournment of the telephone conference originally scheduled for April 29, 2021 (see Order, ECF No. 246, at 1) due to the unavailability of defense counsel Greg Tabakman, Esq. Defendant states that it sought Plaintiff’s consent but has had difficulty communicating with Plaintiff, who has been traveling abroad, apparently with intermittent internet access. The Court hereby ORDERS that the telephone conference originally scheduled for April 29, 2021 is adjourned sine die. No later than Tuesday, May 4, 2021, the parties shall file a joint letter providing three mutually available dates for that telephone conference. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York April 26, 2021 ______________________________ STEWART D. AARON United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?