Elias v. City of New York et al

Filing 62

ORDER OF DISMISSAL.... It is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is n ot consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending mo tions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/10/22) (yv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
Case 1:19-cv-11411-JMF Document 62 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : RIFKA RENEE ELIAS, : : Plaintiff, : : -v: : CITY OF NEW YORK et al., : : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X 19-CV-11411 (JMF) ORDER OF DISMISSAL JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: The Court received the attached email from Plaintiff, pro se, on January 9, 2022, advising that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 10, 2022 New York, New York _______________________________ JESSE M. FURMAN United States District Judge Case 1:19-cv-11411-JMF Document 62 Filed 01/10/22 Page 2 of 3 Case 1:19-cv-11411-JMF Document 62 Filed 01/10/22 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?