Chen et al v. Dun Huang Corp et al
ORDER denying as moot 32 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion to Dismiss; denying 59 Motion to Dismiss: Defendants' motion to dismiss dated March 4, 2020 is DENIED as moot, because Plaintiffs subsequently fi led an amended complaint, (ECF No. 38). For the reasons stated on the record during today's oral argument, Defendants Dun Huang New York Corp., DH Newland Corp, New York Dun Huang Inc, Lanzhou Beef Noodle Inc, John Doe Corp, Dun Huang Newland Co rp, Zhongqi Bian, Hong Ji, Siwen Liu, and Haijun Lu's motions to dismiss the claims alleged against them in the amended complaint are GRANTED. Defendants Shiyang Li and Yang Liu's motion to dismiss the claims alleged against them in the ame nded complaint is DENIED. Defendant Dun Huang Carp's motion to dismiss Count I of the amended complaint is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motions at ECF Nos. 32, 54, and 59. (Party Dun Huang New York Corp., Dun Huang Newland Corp, Hong Ji, John Doe Corp, Lanzhou Beef Noodle Inc, Siwen Liu, Haijun Lu, New York Dun Huang Inc, Zhongqi Bian and DH Newland Corp terminated.) (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 1/6/2021) (jwh) Modified on 1/6/2021 (jwh).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?