Massey v. Sapp et al

Filing 65

ORDER: In a letter appearing at Docket Entry No. 64, the plaintiff, who is no longer appearing pro se, requested, inter alia, that the Court provide pro bono counsel to him. Inasmuch as the plaintiff is no longer representing himself and has acquired counsel, he may not communicate with the Court directly; his communications with the Court must only be through his counsel. Therefore, the requests made by the plaintiff through Docket Entry No. 64 are denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 6/3/2021) (rro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X : TYRONE MASSEY, : Plaintiff, : : -against: : CAPTAIN SAPP, et al. : : Defendants. : ------------------------------------------------------------------------X KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDER 19-CV-11902 (GBD)(KNF) In a letter appearing at Docket Entry No. 64, the plaintiff, who is no longer appearing pro se, requested, inter alia, that the Court provide pro bono counsel to him. Inasmuch as the plaintiff is no longer representing himself and has acquired counsel, he may not communicate with the Court directly; his communications with the Court must only be through his counsel. Therefore, the requests made by the plaintiff through Docket Entry No. 64 are denied. Dated: New York, New York June 3, 2021 SO ORDERED:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?