Kewazinga Corp. v. Google LLC

Filing 224

ORDER granting 217 Letter Motion to Seal. The motion to seal is GRANTED. The confidential business information is of the type previously approved for redactions and the redactions are narrowly tailored. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to maintain Dkt. No. 219 under seal, with access limited to the parties listed in the Appendix at Dkt. No. 223, and to close the motion at Dkt. No. 217. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/20/2022) (mml)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-01106-LGS Document 224 Filed 09/20/22 Page 1 of 2 IAN G. DIBERNARDO IDiBernardo@brownrudnick.com September 14, 2022 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Honorable Lorna G. Schofield United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: The motion to seal is GRANTED. The confidential business information is of the type previously approved for redactions and the redactions are narrowly tailored. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to maintain Dkt. No. 219 under seal, with access limited to the parties listed in the Appendix at Dkt. No. 223, and to close the motion at Dkt. No. 217. Dated: September 20, 2022 New York, New York Kewazinga Corp. v. Google LLC, Case No. 1:20-cv-1106-LGS (S.D.N.Y.) Request for Permission to Redact Kewazinga’s Opposition to Google’s Letter on Proposed Summary Judgment Dear Honorable Judge Schofield: Plaintiff Kewazinga Corp. (“Kewazinga”) respectfully requests permission to file a redacted version of its concurrently filed Opposition to Defendant Google LLC’s (“Google”) Letter on Proposed Summary Judgment (“Letter”), with an unredacted version to be filed under seal. Kewazinga makes this request pursuant to the Local Rules of the Southern District of New York, The Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Civil and Criminal Case Files of the Southern District of New York, and Your Honor’s Individual Rule I(D)(3). Kewazinga understands that the Letter may include information which Google has designated as confidential, and that Google may seek to redact. Although Kewazinga cannot demonstrate that the material designated by Google should be kept under seal, Kewazinga does not oppose Google’s position as to those designations. As such, Kewazinga anticipates that Google will file a letter in support of this motion to seal. Specifically, Kewazinga requests an order granting leave to file under seal the portions as listed and identified below: Portion to Be Filed Under Seal Highlighted portions in yellow of the Letter at pgs. 1 and 2. Designating Party Google Case 1:20-cv-01106-LGS Document 224 Filed 09/20/22 Page 2 of 2 Honorable Lorna G. Schofield September 14, 2022 Page 2 Dated: September 14, 2022 /s/ Ian G. DiBernardo Ian G. DiBernardo Jason M. Sobel Timothy J. Rousseau Haroon N. Mian Harold S. Laidlaw BROWN RUDNICK LLP 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036 Tel: (212) 209-4800 Fax: (212) 209-4801 idibernardo@brownrudnick.com jsobel@brownrudnick.com kstein@brownrudnick.com trousseau @brownrudnick.com hmian@brownrudnick.com hlaidlaw@brownrudnick.com Timothy K. Gilman Saunak K. Desai Gregory R. Springsted STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Tel: (212) 806-5400 Fax: (212) 806-6006 tgilman@stroock.com sdesai@stroock.com gspringsted@stroock.com Counsel for Plaintiff Kewazinga Corp. cc: All Counsel (by ECF Filing)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?