Kewazinga Corp. v. Google LLC
Filing
224
ORDER granting 217 Letter Motion to Seal. The motion to seal is GRANTED. The confidential business information is of the type previously approved for redactions and the redactions are narrowly tailored. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to maintain Dkt. No. 219 under seal, with access limited to the parties listed in the Appendix at Dkt. No. 223, and to close the motion at Dkt. No. 217. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/20/2022) (mml)
Case 1:20-cv-01106-LGS Document 224 Filed 09/20/22 Page 1 of 2
IAN G. DIBERNARDO
IDiBernardo@brownrudnick.com
September 14, 2022
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
Honorable Lorna G. Schofield
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007
Re:
The motion to seal is GRANTED. The confidential business
information is of the type previously approved for redactions and
the redactions are narrowly tailored. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of
Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The Clerk of Court
is respectfully directed to maintain Dkt. No. 219 under seal, with
access limited to the parties listed in the Appendix at Dkt. No. 223,
and to close the motion at Dkt. No. 217.
Dated: September 20, 2022
New York, New York
Kewazinga Corp. v. Google LLC, Case No. 1:20-cv-1106-LGS (S.D.N.Y.)
Request for Permission to Redact Kewazinga’s Opposition to Google’s Letter on
Proposed Summary Judgment
Dear Honorable Judge Schofield:
Plaintiff Kewazinga Corp. (“Kewazinga”) respectfully requests permission to file a redacted
version of its concurrently filed Opposition to Defendant Google LLC’s (“Google”) Letter on
Proposed Summary Judgment (“Letter”), with an unredacted version to be filed under seal.
Kewazinga makes this request pursuant to the Local Rules of the Southern District of New York,
The Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Civil and Criminal Case Files of
the Southern District of New York, and Your Honor’s Individual Rule I(D)(3). Kewazinga
understands that the Letter may include information which Google has designated as
confidential, and that Google may seek to redact. Although Kewazinga cannot demonstrate that
the material designated by Google should be kept under seal, Kewazinga does not oppose
Google’s position as to those designations. As such, Kewazinga anticipates that Google will file
a letter in support of this motion to seal.
Specifically, Kewazinga requests an order granting leave to file under seal the portions as
listed and identified below:
Portion to Be Filed Under Seal
Highlighted portions in yellow of the Letter at
pgs. 1 and 2.
Designating Party
Google
Case 1:20-cv-01106-LGS Document 224 Filed 09/20/22 Page 2 of 2
Honorable Lorna G. Schofield
September 14, 2022
Page 2
Dated: September 14, 2022
/s/ Ian G. DiBernardo
Ian G. DiBernardo
Jason M. Sobel
Timothy J. Rousseau
Haroon N. Mian
Harold S. Laidlaw
BROWN RUDNICK LLP
7 Times Square
New York, New York 10036
Tel: (212) 209-4800
Fax: (212) 209-4801
idibernardo@brownrudnick.com
jsobel@brownrudnick.com
kstein@brownrudnick.com
trousseau @brownrudnick.com
hmian@brownrudnick.com
hlaidlaw@brownrudnick.com
Timothy K. Gilman
Saunak K. Desai
Gregory R. Springsted
STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
180 Maiden Lane
New York, New York 10038
Tel: (212) 806-5400
Fax: (212) 806-6006
tgilman@stroock.com
sdesai@stroock.com
gspringsted@stroock.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
Kewazinga Corp.
cc: All Counsel (by ECF Filing)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?