Kewazinga Corp. v. Google LLC
Filing
563
ORDER: As discussed at the conference, it is hereby ORDERED that, by the dates and times below (which supersede any inconsistent deadlines set at the conference) the parties shall undertake the following: 1. by October 25, 2024, 5:00 P.M., the pa rties shall file letters including any proposed revisions the list of individuals who will be introduced to the jury as counsel or assisting counsel, or as potential witnesses or people whose names may be mentioned; 2. by October 24, 2024, at noo n, the parties shall exchange revised lists of exhibits and written discovery each party intends to introduce at trial, reflecting the guidance provided at the conference. By October 25, 2024 at noon, the parties shall confer and file revised exhi bit lists (including written discovery), clearly showing which items may be preadmitted at the beginning of trial (either by agreement or by a ruling or by applying a similar ruling), and which documents have outstanding objections. The parties m ay file a letter identifying any outstanding issues for the Court to address. If documents with outstanding objections are voluminous, the Court may convene another conference to address them; 3. by October 24, 2024, at noon, Defendant shall file a letter with argument and case law regarding item #3 in Kewazinga's objection letter (Dkt. 540), exhibits relating to features of Kewazinga's prototype product, particularly on the issues of infringement and willfulness. By October 28, 2024, Plaintiff shall file a letter response; 4. by October 28, 2024, Plaintiff shall file a letter with argument and case law regarding its proposal to seek a certain amount or more in damages. Defendant shall file a response by October 30, 2024. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/23/2024) (tg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------X
:
KEWAZINGA CORP.,
:
Plaintiff, :
:
-against:
:
GOOGLE, LLC,
:
Defendant. :
:
------------------------------------------------------------ X
20 Civ. 1106 (LGS)
ORDER
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
WHEREAS, the final pretrial conference was held on October 22, 2024. As discussed at
the conference, it is hereby
ORDERED that, by the dates and times below (which supersede any inconsistent
deadlines set at the conference) the parties shall undertake the following:
1. by October 25, 2024, 5:00 P.M., the parties shall file letters including any proposed
revisions the list of individuals who will be introduced to the jury as counsel or assisting
counsel, or as potential witnesses or people whose names may be mentioned;
2. by October 24, 2024, at noon, the parties shall exchange revised lists of exhibits and written
discovery each party intends to introduce at trial, reflecting the guidance provided at the
conference. By October 25, 2024 at noon, the parties shall confer and file revised exhibit
lists (including written discovery), clearly showing which items may be preadmitted at the
beginning of trial (either by agreement or by a ruling or by applying a similar ruling), and
which documents have outstanding objections. The parties may file a letter identifying any
outstanding issues for the Court to address. If documents with outstanding objections are
voluminous, the Court may convene another conference to address them;
3. by October 24, 2024, at noon, Defendant shall file a letter with argument and case law
regarding item #3 in Kewazinga’s objection letter (Dkt. 540), exhibits relating to features of
Kewazinga’s prototype product, particularly on the issues of infringement and willfulness.
By October 28, 2024, Plaintiff shall file a letter response;
4. by October 28, 2024, Plaintiff shall file a letter with argument and case law regarding its
proposal to seek a certain amount or more in damages. Defendant shall file a response by
October 30, 2024.
Dated: October 23, 2024
New York, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?