Wenger S.A. v. Galaxy Brands LLC et al
Filing
297
ORDER granting 294 Letter Motion to Seal. The reply brief may remain sealed. By November 21, 2023, at 5:00 p.m., Olivet shall submit a redacted version of the brief to be publicly available according to this Court's individual practices. (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 11/13/2023) (tro)
Case 1:20-cv-01107-AS Document 294 Filed 11/10/23 Page 1 of 1
Matthew S. Trokenheim | Partner
Direct 973.681.7024 | mtrokenheim@goldbergsegalla.com
November 10, 2023
VIA ECF
Hon. Arun Subramanian
United States District Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 15A
New York, New York 10007
Re:
Wenger S.A. v. Olivet International Inc.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 1:20-cv-01107-AS
Letter Motion to Seal
Dear Judge Subramanian,
We represent defendant Olivet International Inc. (“Olivet”) in the above referenced action
by plaintiff Wenger S.A. (“Wenger”). Olivet submits this Letter Motion to Seal Olivet’s Reply
Memorandum of Law in further support of its motion for summary judgment pursuant to Your
Honor’s Individual Rules and Procedures for Civil Cases and Court’s standing order, 19-mc00583, and ECF Rules & Instructions, section 6. The Reply Memorandum of Law, like the
moving Memorandum of Law, includes information from documents and exhibits designated as
“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” under the Protective Oder entered in this action on July
31, 2020. Such Confidential and Highly Confidential information includes financial information
of plaintiff Wenger.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP
The reply brief may remain sealed. By
November 21, 2023, at 5:00 p.m., Olivet
shall submit a redacted version of the brief to
be publicly available according to this
Court's individual practices.
SO ORDERED.
Arun Subramanian, U.S.D.J.
November 13, 2023
Matthew S. Trokenheim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?