Foreman v. Sephora USA, Inc.

Filing 8

ORDER: There having been no action in this case for over two years, it is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. See also Martens v. Thomann, 273 F. 3d 159, 179 (2d Cir. 2001) ("A district court also has the power to dismiss for failure to prosecute sua sponte."). (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 1/17/2023) (rro)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-01115-LLS Document 8 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 1 [lrsoc ORIGINAL :r ~DN~· I DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK STAR FOREMAN , Plaintiff , - against - 1 r.LECTRO . ·1c \LLY FILE P '1 0 ' I .:_ - - ----.----- II l>ATE r-; i FD· _L[/ 1 /1,....'). __ SEPHORA USA , INC ., ORDER Defendant. There having been no action in this case for over two years , it is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute . See also Martens v . Thomann , 273 F . 3d 159, 179 (2d ("A district court also has the power to dismiss for failure to prosecute sua sponte .u ) . So Ordered . Dated : h '====-: - .:._____ ____ ·- - 20 Civ . 1115 (LLS ) Cir . 2001) 1 New York , New York January 17 , 2023 iOJuA L.sWnv LOUIS L. STANTON U. S . D. J .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?