Foreman v. Sephora USA, Inc.

Filing 8

ORDER: There having been no action in this case for over two years, it is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. See also Martens v. Thomann, 273 F. 3d 159, 179 (2d Cir. 2001) ("A district court also has the power to dismiss for failure to prosecute sua sponte."). (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 1/17/2023) (rro)

Case 1:20-cv-01115-LLS Document 8 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 1

[lrsoc

ORIGINAL

:r

~DN~·

I DOCUMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
STAR FOREMAN ,
Plaintiff ,
- against -

1

r.LECTRO . ·1c \LLY FILE P
'1 0 '

I

.:_

- - ----.----- II

l>ATE r-; i FD·

_L[/ 1 /1,....'). __

SEPHORA USA , INC .,
ORDER
Defendant.

There having been no action in this case for over two
years , it is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l (b)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to
prosecute . See also Martens v . Thomann , 273 F . 3d 159, 179 (2d
("A district court also has the power to dismiss for

failure to prosecute sua sponte .u ) .
So Ordered .
Dated :

h

'====-: - .:._____ ____ ·- -

20 Civ . 1115 (LLS )

Cir . 2001)

1

New York , New York
January 17 , 2023

iOJuA L.sWnv

LOUIS L. STANTON
U. S . D. J .