Trader v. SeatGeek, Inc.
Filing
22
ORDER: granting #21 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference; granting #21 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application GRANTED. This case is STAYED pending the parties' attempts to resolve this matter. The parties are directed to provide joint updates every 3 months regarding the status of mediation. The first update is due on December 1, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 8/26/2020) (ama)
Case 1:20-cv-03248-VEC Document 21 Filed 08/26/20 Page 1 of 2
22
MEMO ENDORSED
Celia Goldwag Barenholtz
T: +1 212 479 6330
cbarenholtz@cooley.com
August 26, 2020
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 8/26/2020
VIA ECF
Honorable Valerie Caproni
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
Submitted via ECF
Re:
Trader v. SeatGeek, Case No. 20-cv-03248-VEC
Dear Judge Caproni:
We represent Defendant SeatGeek, Inc. in the above-referenced matter. We are writing on behalf of both
parties to request (a) an adjournment of Initial Pretrial Conference set for September 18, 2020, and (b) an
extension of Defendant’s time to move, answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint, in
order to allow the parties to engage in mediation.
This action was filed on April 24, 2020. Plaintiffs Snyder and Anderson1 filed their First Amended
Complaint on May 18 [Dkt. 13]. On June 6, Plaintiffs asked the Court adjourn the Initial Pretrial
Conference in light of their pending Motion for Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 before the Judicial
Panel on Multidistrict Litigation [Dkt. 14]. The Court granted Plaintiffs’ request and adjourned the Initial
Pretrial Conference until September 18. [Dkt. 15]. On July 29, Defendant filed a stipulation accepting
service and reflecting the parties’ agreement that Defendant would move, answer or otherwise respond to
the First Amended Complaint by the later of September 4, 2020, or 30 days after the ruling on the Motion
to Transfer. [Dkt.19]. On August 6, the Panel denied Plaintiffs’ request to transfer the matter. [MDL No.
2951 IN RE: Secondary Ticket Market Refund Litigation, Dkt. 36]. Pursuant to the prior stipulation,
Defendant’s deadline to move, answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint is
September 8.
Counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendant subsequently conferred, and the parties agreed to enter into a
mediation in an effort to reach a consensual resolution of the Plaintiffs’ claims. The parties are in the
process of selecting a mediator and scheduling a mediation date.
The parties believe that a stay of proceedings before this Court will assist them in reaching an expedient
resolution. This is Defendant’s first request for adjournment and the second request for an adjournment in
the action.
Therefore, the parties respectfully request the Court adjourn the Initial Pretrial Conference set for
September 18, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. and stay the deadline for Defendant SeatGeek to move, answer or
otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint until 30 days following the completion of
mediation if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute.
1
The Plaintiff in the original Complaint, William Trader, withdrew and was replaced by Plaintiffs Dustin
Snyder and Lindsey Anderson in the First Amended Complaint.
Cooley LLP 55 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001-2157
t: (212) 479-6000 f: (212) 479-6275 cooley.com
Case 1:20-cv-03248-VEC Document 21 Filed 08/26/20 Page 2 of 2
22
Honorable Valerie Caproni
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
Submitted via ECF
August 26, 2020
Page Two
Application GRANTED. This case is STAYED
pending the parties' attempts to resolve this matter.
The parties are directed to provide joint updates
every 3 months regarding the status of mediation.
The first update is due on December 1, 2020.
SO ORDERED.
Respectfully yours,
/s/ Celia Goldwag Barenholtz
CGB
HON. VALERIE CAPRONI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cooley LLP 55 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001-2157
t: (212) 479-6000 f: (212) 479-6275 cooley.com
8/26/2020
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?