Khudai v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 129

ORDER On April 23, 2024, Plaintiff moved "to allow the sealing of this entire case." ECF No. 120 at 1. That motion is denied because it is not "narrowly tailored[,]" see Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006), and fails to comply with Rule 9 of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, see, e.g., R. 9.C ("The party seeking leave to file sealed or redacted materials should meet and confer with any opposing party...in advance to narrow the scope of the request."). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 5/9/2024) (jca)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

5/9/2024

RAWNAQ KHUDAI,
Plaintiff,
-v.-

20 Civ. 03686 (JHR) (JLC)
ORDER

AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES et al.,
Defendants.
JENNIFER H. REARDEN, District Judge:
On April 23, 2024, Plaintiff moved “to allow the sealing of this entire case.” ECF
No. 120 at 1. That motion is denied because it is not “narrowly tailored[,]” see Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006), and fails to comply with Rule 9
of the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, see, e.g., R. 9.C (“The party seeking
leave to file sealed or redacted materials should meet and confer with any opposing party . . . in
advance to narrow the scope of the request.”).
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 9, 2024
New York, New York

JJENNIFER
ENNIF
IF
FER H. REARDEN
U
Un
United
ited States District Judge