Jones v. City Of New York et al

Filing 57

ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that by January 14, 2022, Plaintiff's former counsel must file a new notice of appearance in this action, or he must file a letter explaining whether and how Plaintiff will be represented in this action. It is furt her ORDERED that by January 28, 2022, the parties must file a joint status letter speaking to (1) whether any settlement progress has been made in this action since the August 12, 2021 hearing; and (2) what remains outstanding in this action. The p arties need not disclose the substantive details of any settlement discussions. In addition, the parties may propose an amended case management plan if the delays that have occurred since August render that necessary. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 1/11/22) (yv)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-04368-VSB-BCM Document 57 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------X : TRACY JONES, on behalf of her minor : : son, M.J., : : Plaintiff, : : -against: CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., : : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------X 20-CV-4368 (VSB) ORDER VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: On August 12, 2021, Plaintiff’s former counsel voiced his intent to withdraw as her attorney, in response to which I cautioned Plaintiff that she must find new counsel in order to proceed in this action given that she is representing the interest of a minor. (Doc. 44.) I granted Plaintiff’s former attorney’s motion to withdraw on August 17, 2021. (Doc. 46.) On December 27, 2021, pro bono counsel appeared on Plaintiff’s behalf via a “Notice of Limited Scope Appearance,” stating that pro bono counsel would only represent Plaintiff for settlement or mediation purposes. (Doc. 51.) That same day, I entered an order referring this case to the designated magistrate judge for, among other things, settlement purposes. (Doc. 53.) However, on January 4, 2022, Plaintiff’s former counsel filed a letter seeking permission to once again appear on Plaintiff’s behalf, (Doc. 54), and on January 5, 2022, I granted his application, (Doc. 55). He has yet to file a new notice of appearance. On January 6, 2022, Plaintiff’s pro bono counsel filed a notice of completion of limited scope representation. (Doc. 56.) As such, Plaintiff is no longer represented in this action. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that by January 14, 2022, Plaintiff’s former counsel must file a new notice of Case 1:20-cv-04368-VSB-BCM Document 57 Filed 01/11/22 Page 2 of 2 appearance in this action, or he must file a letter explaining whether and how Plaintiff will be represented in this action. It is further ORDERED that by January 28, 2022, the parties must file a joint status letter speaking to (1) whether any settlement progress has been made in this action since the August 12, 2021 hearing; and (2) what remains outstanding in this action. The parties need not disclose the substantive details of any settlement discussions. In addition, the parties may propose an amended case management plan if the delays that have occurred since August render that necessary. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 11, 2022 New York, New York ______________________ Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?