Guzman v. Mi Pueblito, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER: The Court has reviewed the parties' settlement agreement appearing at Docket Entry No. 22 and finds that paragraphs 7(c), (e), (f), (g) and (h) continue to suffer from the problems discussed with the parties during the March 31, 2021 telephonic conference. The parties are to review paragraph 7 of the settlement agreement and make the necessary modification to ensure that the paragraph is fully comprehensible. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 4/1/2021) (va)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------X
BONIFACIO GUZMAN,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
- against :
:
MI PUEBLITO, Inc., and IGNACIO FLORES as an
:
individual,
:
:
Defendants.
:
------------------------------------------------------------------------X
KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER
20-CV-4495 (KNF)

The Court has reviewed the parties’ settlement agreement appearing at Docket Entry No.
22 and finds that paragraphs 7(c), (e), (f), (g) and (h) continue to suffer from the problems
discussed with the parties during the March 31, 2021 telephonic conference. The parties are to
review paragraph 7 of the settlement agreement and make the necessary modification to ensure
that the paragraph is fully comprehensible.
Dated: New York, New York
April 1, 2021

SO ORDERED: