Ahmad v. Day et al
Filing
178
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION AND TIME, MULTIPLIED BY NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS: terminating 177 Motion re: 177 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION. ENDORSEMENT: The page count by plai ntiff includes pages indicating service as well as tables of contents and authorities. The arguments by defendants are in some instances duplicative. A reply brief of 50 pages is more than sufficient. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 8/01/2022) (ama)
Case 1:20-cv-04507-AT-GWG Document 178
177 Filed 08/01/22
07/29/22 Page 1 of 1
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
_____________________________________
MAHFOOZ AHMAD
Plaintiff (s),
MEMORANDUM ENDORSED
Docket No : 1:20-CV -04507- AT-GWG
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION
-againstCOLIN DAY, COURTNEY DUTTER, iCIMS INC,
BEACON HILL STAFFING GROUP, NAVI HEALTH INC,
VISTA EQUITY PARTNERS, CLAY RICHARDS,
SUSQUEHANNA GROWTH EQUITY, COMCAST CORPORATION.
Defendants (s).
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION AND TIME,
MULTIPLIED BY NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS
The page count by plaintiff includes
pages indicating service as well as
Mahfooz Ahmad
tables of contents and authorities. The
T: +1.718.536.1972
arguments by defendants are in some
E: mahfoozahmad2092@gmail.com
instances duplicative. A reply brief of
224 Porters Hill Rd,
50 pages is more than sufficient.
So Ordered.
August 1, 2022
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?