Ahmad v. Day et al

Filing 178

MEMO ENDORSEMENT on PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION AND TIME, MULTIPLIED BY NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS: terminating 177 Motion re: 177 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION. ENDORSEMENT: The page count by plai ntiff includes pages indicating service as well as tables of contents and authorities. The arguments by defendants are in some instances duplicative. A reply brief of 50 pages is more than sufficient. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 8/01/2022) (ama)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-04507-AT-GWG Document 178 177 Filed 08/01/22 07/29/22 Page 1 of 1 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
 _____________________________________
 MAHFOOZ AHMAD 
 Plaintiff (s), MEMORANDUM ENDORSED Docket No : 1:20-CV -04507- AT-GWG PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION
 -againstCOLIN DAY, COURTNEY DUTTER, iCIMS INC, BEACON HILL STAFFING GROUP, NAVI HEALTH INC, 
 VISTA EQUITY PARTNERS, CLAY RICHARDS, SUSQUEHANNA GROWTH EQUITY, COMCAST CORPORATION.
 Defendants (s). PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION AND TIME, MULTIPLIED BY NUMBER OF DEFENDANTS The page count by plaintiff includes pages indicating service as well as Mahfooz Ahmad tables of contents and authorities. The T: +1.718.536.1972
 arguments by defendants are in some E: mahfoozahmad2092@gmail.com instances duplicative. A reply brief of 224 Porters Hill Rd,
 50 pages is more than sufficient. So Ordered. August 1, 2022

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?