Moudgil v. Fujifilm North America Corp.

Filing 18

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court is informed by the court-appointed mediator that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 17]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made by February 8, 2021. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 1/7/2021) (rro)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-04732-MKV Document 18 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 1 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 1/7/2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIBHAKER MOUDGIL, Plaintiff, 1:20-cv-04732-MKV -againstORDER OF DISMISSAL FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORP., Defendant. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is informed by the court-appointed mediator that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 17]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the abovecaptioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by February 8, 2021. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. Date: January 7, 2021 New York, NY _________________________________ MARY KAY VYSKOCIL United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?