Hennelly v. Saul

Filing 9

ORDER granting 8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The time for the plaintiff's motion adjourned until March 19, 2021. The defendant's cross motion due April 23, 2021. The plaintiff's reply due May 14. The defendant's reply due May 28, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/17/2021) (ks) (Main Document 9 replaced on 2/17/2021) (ks).

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-04786-JGK Document 9 Filed 02/17/21 Page 1 of 1 CHRISTOPHER J. BOWES, ESQ. 54 Cobblestone Drive Shoreham, NY 11786 Tel (212) 979-7575 Fax (631) 929-1700 February 16, 2021 Via ECF Hon. John G. Koeltl United States Magistrate Judge 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: Hennelly v. Saul 20 Civ. 4786 (JGK) Dear Judge Koeltl: I am writing to request an extension of time to file plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum of Law in Support thereof. Plaintiff’s papers are due to be filed today. This is plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Due to an inordinately busy work schedule coupled with the inherent difficulties of working remotely with my assistant, I am experiencing some slowdown in my productivity. With the consent of Ms. Baird, I respectfully request that the Court approve the following revised briefing schedule: March 18, 2021 May 17, 2021 June 1, 2021 June 15, 2021 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Defendant's Cross-Motion Plaintiff's Reply Brief Defendant's Reply Brief Thank you for you for Your Honor’s attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Christopher J. Bowes Christopher J. Bowes Attorney for Plaintiff cc: AUSA Susan D. Baird 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10007 The time for the plaintiff’s motion adjourned until March 19, 2021. The defendant’s cross motion due April 23, 2021. The plaintiff’s reply due May 14. The defedant’s reply due May 28, 2021. SO ORDERED /s/ John G. Koeltl February 17, 2021 John G. Koeltl New York, NY U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?