Melius v. New York City Council et al

Filing 88

ORDER: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be cons ummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be "so ordered" by the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 2/05/2024) (ama)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SHANA MELIUS,
Plaintiff,
-againstCOUNCIL MEMBER ANDY KING, in his
individual capacity,

ORDER
20-cv-5237 (ER)

Defendant.
RAMOS, D.J.:
�e Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is
ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either
party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of
the date hereof.
Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any
application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are
advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing
any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the
next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 5, 2024
New York, New York

Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.