Galvez Duran et al v. T&S Restaurant LLC et al

Filing 15

ORDER: Accordingly, all the Defendants were required to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint between October 30 to November 3, 2020. To date, the Defendants have not appeared, answered, or otherwise responded to the Complaint. Accordingl y, the Plaintiffs are directed to file a letter no later than January 15, 2021, indicating whether they intend to move for default against the Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, or why the action should not otherwise be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 1/8/2021) (js)

Case 1:20-cv-07090-PAE-SN Document 15 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------X

1/8/2021

NESTOR ISMAEL GALVEZ DURAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

20-CV-07090 (PAE)(SN)
ORDER

-againstT&S RESTAURANT, LLC., et al.,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge:

On August 31, 2020, the Plaintiffs filed the Complaint. ECF No. 1. On November 3,
2020, the Plaintiff filed proof of service as to Defendant T&S Restaurant, indicating it had been
served on October 13, 2020. ECF No. 12. On December 3, 2020, the Plaintiff filed proof of
service as to Defendants Anastacius Katsaros and Stavros Nikolakakos, indicating both were
served on October 9, 2020. See ECF Nos. 13 & 14. Accordingly, all the Defendants were
required to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint between October 30 to November 3,
2020. To date, the Defendants have not appeared, answered, or otherwise responded to the
Compalint. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs are directed to file a letter no later than January 15, 2021,
indicating whether they intend to move for default against the Defendants pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 55, or why the action should not otherwise be dismissed for failure to
prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
SO ORDERED.

DATED:

New York, New York
January 8, 2021