Villafane, Jr. v. City of New York

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. The parties' request to adjourn sine die the Initial Pretrial Conference scheduled for February 2, 2021, and the deadline to submit a joint letter and the Proposed Case Manage ment Plan and Scheduling Order is GRANTED. The parties shall file a joint letter within five days of mediation advising the Court of the status (not substance) of settlement discussions whether mediation was successful, whether discussions are ongoing, etc.and, if necessary, requesting that the Court reschedule the Initial Pretrial Conference. See S.D.N.Y. Local Civ. R. 83.10 § 10. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 1/8/2021) (mro)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-07357-MKV Document 15 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 1/8/2021 THE CITY OF NEW YORK LAW DEPARTMENT JAMES E. JOHNSON Corporation Counsel 100 CHURCH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 INNA SHAPOVALOVA Assistant Corporation Counsel Phone: (212) 356-2656 Fax: (212) 356-3509 Email: inshapov@law.nyc.gov January 7, 2021 BY ECF Honorable Mary Kay Vyskocil United States District Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: Juan Villafane, Jr. v. City of New York, et al. 20 CV 7357 (MKV) Your Honor: I am an Assistant Corporation Counsel in the Office of James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, and the attorney assigned to represent defendant the City of New York (“City”) in the above-referenced matter. Defendant City writes to respectfully request an adjournment, sine die, of the Initial Conference currently scheduled for February 2, 2021 and the deadline to submit a Proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order and joint letter currently due one week prior to the Initial Conference scheduled for February 2, 2021 as outlined in the Court’s Order dated December 18, 2020. This is the first request for an adjournment of the Initial Conference. Plaintiff’s counsel, Gary S. Fish, consents to this request. By way of background, plaintiff bring this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging, inter alia, false arrest, excessive force, malicious prosecution, and a New York State law battery claim arising from his arrest on or about January 16, 2020. Plaintiff names the City of New York, the New York City Police Department, John Does # 1-7, and Richard Roes #1-8 as defendants in this action. Defendant City was served with the Complaint, a N.Y. C.P.L. § 160.50 release, and a medical release on September 29, 2020. Defendant City, with the consent of plaintiff’s counsel, wrote to the Court on December 11, 2020 requesting for this case to be formally designated to proceed pursuant Local Civil Rule 83.10 (“the § 1983 Plan”). Your Honor granted defendant City’s request and requested that the Clerk of Court designate this case to proceed pursuant to the § 1983 Plan as set forth in Local Civil Rule 83.10. (ECF No. 11). Pursuant to the § 1983 Plan defendant City filed its Answer to plaintiff’s Complaint on December 18, 2020. On Case 1:20-cv-07357-MKV Document 15 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 2 December 18, 2020 the Court scheduled an Initial Conference to be held on February 2, 2021. (ECF No. 13) Under the terms of the § 1983 Plan, the parties are to have their Rule 26(f) conference within 14 days after the first defendant files its answer, initial disclosures should be exchanged within 21 days after the first defendant files its answer, and specific documents are to be exchanged between the parties within 28 days after the first defendant files its answer. (See S.D.N.Y. Local Civ. R. 83.10 §§ 4-5.) All other discovery is stayed, as the parties are then directed to engage in settlement discussions and either have a settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge or a mediation session with a Southern District mediator. (See S.D.N.Y. Local Civ. R. 83.10 §§ 5-8.) Accordingly, defendant City respectfully submits that an Initial Conference at this stage is not necessary, as a limited discovery schedule has already been set forth in the Section 1983 Plan, and all other discovery is stayed pending a settlement conference or mediation session. Based on the foregoing, defendant City respectfully requests that the Initial Conference as well as the deadline to submit a Proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order and joint letter be adjourned sine die , until sometime after the parties have completed limited discovery and mediation under Local Civil Rule 83.10. Thank you for your consideration herein. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Inna Shapovalova Inna Shapovalova Assistant Corporation Counsel cc: BY ECF Gary S. Fish, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff The parties' request to adjourn sine die the Initial Pretrial Conference scheduled for February 2, 2021, and the deadline to submit a joint letter and the Proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order is GRANTED. The parties shall file a joint letter within five days of mediation advising the Court of the status (not substance) of settlement discussions—whether mediation was successful, whether discussions are ongoing, etc.—and, if necessary, requesting that the Court reschedule the Initial Pretrial Conference. See S.D.N.Y. Local Civ. R. 83.10 § 10. SO ORDERED. 1/8/2021 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?