Syeed v. Bloomberg L.P. et al

Filing 108

CLERK'S RULE 54(b) JUDGMENT re: 102 Order on Motion for Judgment in favor of Bloomberg L.P., John Does 1-10, John Micklethwait, Marty Schenker, Matthew Winkler, Reto Gregori against Nafeesa Syeed. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECRE ED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated April 12, 2022, the Court held a conference to discuss Plaintiffs' motion for final judgment on Plaintiff Nafeesa Syeed's claims pursuant to Rule 54(b). See Dkt. No. 56. For the reasons articulated on the record during that conference, Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED and final judgment is entered against only Ms. Syeed; pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), there is no just reason to delay judgment is hereby entered. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 5/10/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)

Case 1:20-cv-07464-GHW-GWG Document 108 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------X
NAFEESA SYEED and NAULA NDUGGA, on
behalf of herself and similarly situated women,

20 CIVIL 7464 (GHW)

Plaintiffs,

RULE 54(b) JUDGMENT

-againstBLOOMBERG L.P.,

Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------X
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons
stated in the Court's Order dated April 12, 2022, the Court held a conference to discuss
Plaintiffs’ motion for final judgment on Plaintiff Nafeesa Syeed’s claims pursuant to Rule 54(b).
See Dkt. No. 56. For the reasons articulated on the record during that conference, Plaintiffs’
motion is GRANTED and final judgment is entered against only Ms. Syeed; pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 54(b), there is no just reason to delay judgment is hereby entered.
Dated: New York, New York
May 10, 2022

BY:

RUBY J. KRAJICK
_________________________
Clerk of Court
_________________________
Deputy Clerk