OFF-WHITE LLC v. ANOGAR-32 et al.

Filing 26

ORDER: A telephonic conference was held today in the above-captioned matters, at which Plaintiff appeared by counsel. There was no appearance for Defendants, who Plaintiff reports were served (with the exception of Defendant GHH11 STORE, in Case No. 20-CV-7894) on October 14, 2020, with the summons, complaint, and Temporary Restraining Order dated September 29, 2020, as well as the Court's October 13, 2020, orders extending the Temporary Restraining Order (Docket Entry Nos. 7, 20 in Case No . 20-CV-7892; Docket Entry Nos. 21, 23 in Case No. 20-CV-7894; and together the "TRO Orders"). Plaintiff's request to extend the provisions of the TRO Orders is granted (except as to Defendant GHH11 STORE, in Case No. 20-CV-7894, as to which it is denied), through the resolution of Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunction. Except to the extent provided in the preceding sentence, the TRO Orders remain in effect pending resolution of the motions for preliminary injunction. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Defendants, and to file proof of such service. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/27/2020) (ama)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-07892-LTS Document 26 Filed 10/27/20 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x OFF-WHITE LLC, Plaintiff, -v- No. 20-CV-7892 LTS ANOGAR-32, et al., Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------x OFF-WHITE LLC, Plaintiff, -v- No. 20-CV-7894 LTS BEIJING YINYU TRADING CO., LTD, et al., Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------x ORDER A telephonic conference was held today in the above-captioned matters, at which Plaintiff appeared by counsel. There was no appearance for Defendants, who Plaintiff reports were served (with the exception of Defendant GHH11 STORE, in Case No. 20-CV-7894) on October 14, 2020, with the summons, complaint, and Temporary Restraining Order dated September 29, 2020, as well as the Court’s October 13, 2020, orders extending the Temporary Restraining Order (Docket Entry Nos. 7, 20 in Case No. 20-CV-7892; Docket Entry Nos. 21, 23 in Case No. 20-CV-7894; and together the “TRO Orders”). OFF-WHITE - OCT 27 2020 ORD.DOCX VERSION OCTOBER 27, 2020 1 Case 1:20-cv-07892-LTS Document 26 Filed 10/27/20 Page 2 of 2 Plaintiff’s request to extend the provisions of the TRO Orders is granted (except as to Defendant GHH11 STORE, in Case No. 20-CV-7894, as to which it is denied), through the resolution of Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction. Except to the extent provided in the preceding sentence, the TRO Orders remain in effect pending resolution of the motions for preliminary injunction. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Defendants, and to file proof of such service. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York October 27, 2020 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN United States District Judge OFF-WHITE - OCT 27 2020 ORD.DOCX VERSION OCTOBER 27, 2020 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?