Genetec, Inc. v. PROS, Inc

Filing 52

ORDER : In response to the Court's order directing Plaintiff to state its position on whether it will produce the requested witnesses for deposition, Dkt. No. 51, Plaintiff's counsel sent an email to the Court, stating that Plaintiff agreed to produce the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition designees and that the parties are negotiating where the depositions will take place. Plaintiff's counsel copied Defendant's counsel on the email and explained that a filing was not made on t he docket because Plaintiff's counsel has not yet been admitted pro hac vice and because Plaintiff's New York counsel was unavailable to make the filing. Such emails to the Court do not adhere to the Court's Individual Practices; al l future correspondence should be filed on the public docket. Because the discovery dispute has been resolved, the Court denies as moot the remaining portion of Defendant's motion to compel at Dkt. No. 50 concerning depositions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 7/29/2022) (vfr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
GENETEC, INC.,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-v:
:
PROS, INC,
:
:
Defendant.
:
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

07/29/2022

20-cv-7959 (LJL)
ORDER

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge:
In response to the Court’s order directing Plaintiff to state its position on whether it will
produce the requested witnesses for deposition, Dkt. No. 51, Plaintiff’s counsel sent an email to
the Court, stating that Plaintiff agreed to produce the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition designees and that
the parties are negotiating where the depositions will take place. Plaintiff’s counsel copied
Defendant’s counsel on the email and explained that a filing was not made on the docket because
Plaintiff’s counsel has not yet been admitted pro hac vice and because Plaintiff’s New York
counsel was unavailable to make the filing. Such emails to the Court do not adhere to the
Court’s Individual Practices; all future correspondence should be filed on the public docket.
Because the discovery dispute has been resolved, the Court denies as moot the remaining
portion of Defendant’s motion to compel at Dkt. No. 50 concerning depositions.

SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 29, 2022
New York, New York

__________________________________
LEWIS J. LIMAN
United States District Judge