Paul Rudolph Foundation, Inc. v. Paul Rudolph Heritage Foundation et al
Filing
125
ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants' request for an order directing Plaintiff to re-designate the documents (the "Documents") and interrogatory responses (the "Interrogatory Responses") Plaintiff produced with the designation "Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only" ("AEO"), or "find that the AEO designation should be lifted from all documents." (ECF No. 121). The parties shall promptly meet and confer to select 20 exemplar Documents (the "Exemplars") and, by January 20, 2023, Plaintiff shall submit the Exemplars and unredacted Interrogatory Responses to the Court for in camera review. The Court will provide Plaintiff with a link to submit these documents through the Courts file-share system. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 1/17/2023) (tro)
Case 1:20-cv-08180-CM Document 125 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
PAUL RUDOLPH FOUNDATION, INC.,
Plaintiff,
-v-
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 20 Civ. 8180 (CM) (SLC)
PAUL RUDOLPH HERITAGE FOUNDATION and
ERNST WAGNER,
ORDER
Defendants.
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ request for an order directing Plaintiff to re-designate the
documents (the “Documents”) and interrogatory responses (the “Interrogatory Responses”)
Plaintiff produced with the designation “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” (“AEO”), or “find
that the AEO designation should be lifted from all documents.” (ECF No. 121). The parties shall
promptly meet and confer to select 20 exemplar Documents (the “Exemplars”) and, by
January 20, 2023, Plaintiff shall submit the Exemplars and unredacted Interrogatory Responses
to the Court for in camera review. The Court will provide Plaintiff with a link to submit these
documents through the Court’s file-share system.
Dated:
New York, New York
January 17, 2023
SO ORDERED.
_________________________
SARAH L. CAVE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?