Paul Rudolph Foundation, Inc. v. Paul Rudolph Heritage Foundation et al

Filing 125

ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants' request for an order directing Plaintiff to re-designate the documents (the "Documents") and interrogatory responses (the "Interrogatory Responses") Plaintiff produced with the designation "Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only" ("AEO"), or "find that the AEO designation should be lifted from all documents." (ECF No. 121). The parties shall promptly meet and confer to select 20 exemplar Documents (the "Exemplars") and, by January 20, 2023, Plaintiff shall submit the Exemplars and unredacted Interrogatory Responses to the Court for in camera review. The Court will provide Plaintiff with a link to submit these documents through the Courts file-share system. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 1/17/2023) (tro)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-08180-CM Document 125 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PAUL RUDOLPH FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff, -v- CIVIL ACTION NO.: 20 Civ. 8180 (CM) (SLC) PAUL RUDOLPH HERITAGE FOUNDATION and ERNST WAGNER, ORDER Defendants. SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Defendants’ request for an order directing Plaintiff to re-designate the documents (the “Documents”) and interrogatory responses (the “Interrogatory Responses”) Plaintiff produced with the designation “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” (“AEO”), or “find that the AEO designation should be lifted from all documents.” (ECF No. 121). The parties shall promptly meet and confer to select 20 exemplar Documents (the “Exemplars”) and, by January 20, 2023, Plaintiff shall submit the Exemplars and unredacted Interrogatory Responses to the Court for in camera review. The Court will provide Plaintiff with a link to submit these documents through the Court’s file-share system. Dated: New York, New York January 17, 2023 SO ORDERED. _________________________ SARAH L. CAVE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?