Kamara v. Pepperidge Farm, Incorporated
Filing 33
ORDER denying 31 Letter Motion for Discovery. While the filing of answer may impact a motion to dismiss on the failure to comply with the particularity requirements of Rule 9(b), it is not necessarily the case with other grounds asserted in a R ule 12(b)(6) motion. Application to strike answer is DENIED. Application to lift discovery stay is DENIED. Plaintiff is free to advance any argument concerning the answer in its response to the motion to dismiss. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 6/3/2021) (nb)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
