Romero v. Sakar International, Inc.

Filing 7

ORDER granting 6 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/16/2021) (nb)

Download PDF
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ \]_ac egd c ij ÿ fp_ r ÿtuwd xsc ÿy] _anÿ ^ÿbdfeh a eklÿmno qÿ ÿ v ÿca xaÿ z ÿÿ{ ÿ sÿ _ ÿ a Case 1:20-cv-09218-JGK Document 7 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 1 ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ #8ÿ ÿ ?6!ÿ 42ÿ 2 4ÿÿ 7 S! UV ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ > ,606ÿ?ÿ ÿ 14 ÿ  966W ÿÿ 8 X4ÿ 8 8 *7 8 ÿ ')ÿ 9ÿ 4-48YZ/ 4-48Y / 5YY+-ÿ1ÿ 5YY+5ÿ 5 ÿ5 T/2 026ÿW/026ÿ ÿ#8[% ÿ ÿ  A  Z % ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 1354ÿ9ÿ 8 24678 ÿ ÿ Application granted. SO ORDERED. ÿ  ÿ ÿ 5ÿ 2 ÿ 2ÿ ÿ ÿ    New York, New York "62ÿ #4%ÿ5ÿ ! ÿ#$!! 2 2  February 16, 2021 " 54ÿ #4%ÿ& (ÿ 4ÿ 2$!! ÿ )*  '2 +ÿ 4ÿ2 ,22"42ÿ ÿ /s/ John G. Koeltl '2 )*ÿ 8 (ÿ 4 ÿ ')ÿ John G. Koeltl, U.S.D.J. ÿ ÿ ÿ .2ÿÿ 021ÿ66ÿ 46!2%3 #ÿ // %4584ÿ /ÿ 4ÿ *42 6 ,62'ÿ 41 6 ÿ. " 2  ÿ ÿ 8 $245ÿ 2ÿ 6ÿ 2   7ÿ2#2ÿ24##96!&#2. 4ÿ4!64;!&=!ÿÿ314 254!4822ÿ! ÿ5ÿ 02:22&2ÿ96!<ÿ262 & & 4&42ÿ 4 222%06 2ÿ ÿ 7ÿ%22%ÿÿ#064!ÿ2ÿÿ24678 ÿ>>ÿ ÿ!ÿ 2!!6ÿ&42&4!ÿ  ÿ##&41354ÿ9ÿ 86ÿ/ 802 #(ÿ ! 2 ÿ 1354ÿ9ÿ 86$22ÿ6ÿ2ÿ ÿ824$22#6# 4(6ÿ5ÿ654ÿ9ÿ 8ÿ 24678 ÿÿ &6 #7686 &6ÿ(2ÿ #267    ÿ 96!&!ÿ282#ÿ36ÿÿ 4!!62ÿ &5& 2,4ÿ&2,4ÿ#ÿ ! ÿ#!ÿÿ4%#ÿ&!!6,2 %ÿ&$26 40ÿÿ 2*ÿÿ 56ÿ & & ÿ $22 66ÿ 46!2% ÿ 8  ÿ20!2,4ÿ 4ÿ &55 ÿ &6"*42 6 6(!ÿ4083ÿ 1ÿ ÿ 5ÿ$2602 ÿ 2  ÿ ÿ  7  &6 ÿ # .5 , & &   !ÿ%2(!ÿÿ!!5 #ÿ 5#ÿ!&6!2ÿÿÿ0274@2  6%46%ÿ  ! 216ÿ 2 2ÿ 496!ÿ8?#&4! ÿ25#! ÿ 26A5 ÿÿ 3ÿ 4ÿ027!&4 4 ÿ402 (!ÿ202 ÿÿ (6ÿ 6  !  ÿ 2ÿ!ÿ&262ÿÿ2#2ÿ25##6ÿÿ24678ÿ 22%ÿ2  ÿÿ31 254!4@2ÿ21354ÿ9,&423ÿ  6A5#ÿ! ÿ52ÿ25##6ÿ!& 266ÿ!6ÿ 7ÿÿ !ÿ 42ÿ!22ÿ &444@2ÿ  6!ÿ ÿ42ÿ6  ÿ6#!(%ÿ 6  9 &3 ! >   & ÿ  3ÿ36#!ÿ 4!!62ÿ &568222,4ÿ ÿB42ÿ"  ,6#ÿÿ !ÿ6,2 %ÿ&$26 ÿ4#ÿÿ 5(! 6ÿ 4ÿ(ÿ 52&4 &55 ÿÿ &66ÿÿ824 26A02& 2ÿ! 686 ÿ !$2 & # ÿ ÿ ÿ 7ÿÿ 4 4! ÿÿ#4 ÿ2624@2 6*75& ÿ 5ÿ026%!26! ÿ&ÿ31ÿ 5# 7    2 ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ .28%& ÿ50!2 #25#3 ÿ 7  ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ CCEGIKL OQNR #ÿ FHÿ ÿ PIRÿ D MN ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ #8ÿ ÿ ?6!T# 2 4 @ÿ S! ÿ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?