Roe et al v. City of New York et al

Filing 5

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: By order dated November 20, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiffs, within thirty days, to: (1) submit under seal an amended complaint with their real names, signatures, and addresses; (2) submit a motion to proceed anonymously; and (3) pay the $400.00 in filing fees or each Plaintiff request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees, by submitting three signed IFP applications. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action. Plaintiffs have not complied with the Court's November 20, 2020 order. Accordingly, the action, presumably filed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Because Plaintiffs did not provide physical or email addresses to the Court, the Clerk of Court is not be able to send this order to Plaintiffs. Should Plaintiffs appear in person at the Court, the Clerk of Court is directed to provide Plaintiffs with a copy of this order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 1/5/21) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Case 1:20-cv-09635-LLS Document 5 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JOHN ROE; JANE DOE; JANE DOE 2,
Plaintiffs,
-againstCITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,

20-CV-9635 (LLS)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Defendants.
LOUIS L. STANTON, United States District Judge:
By order dated November 20, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiffs, within thirty days, to:
(1) submit under seal an amended complaint with their real names, signatures, and addresses;
(2) submit a motion to proceed anonymously; and (3) pay the $400.00 in filing fees or each
Plaintiff request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of
fees, by submitting three signed IFP applications. That order specified that failure to comply
would result in dismissal of the action. Plaintiffs have not complied with the Court’s November
20, 2020 order. Accordingly, the action, presumably filed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1),
is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
Because Plaintiffs did not provide physical or email addresses to the Court, the Clerk of
Court is not be able to send this order to Plaintiffs. Should Plaintiffs appear in person at the
Court, the Clerk of Court is directed to provide Plaintiffs with a copy of this order.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 5, 2021
New York, New York
Louis L. Stanton
U.S.D.J.