Rodriguez v. City of New York et al

Filing 83

ORDER granting 81 Letter Motion to Stay re: 81 LETTER MOTION to Stay (continued stay) addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Katherine J. Weall dated January 7, 2022. Defendant City of New Yorks January 7, 2022 request for an e xtension of the stay of this case as to C.O. Aleksandr Galuzevskiy because of military service, Dkt. No. 81, is granted. This case is stayed with respect to C.O. Galuzevskiy through February 22, 2022. Defendant City of New York is instructed to sub mit a letter describing the status of C.O. Galuzevskiy's military leave no later than February 23, 2022.The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. So Ordered.. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/8/2022) (js) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-09840-GHW Document 83 Filed 01/08/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PETER RODRIGUEZ, USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 1/8/2022 Plaintiff, -againstCITY OF NEW YORK, E.S.U. CAPTAIN MOISE #1451, CAPTAIN GIBSON, E.S.U. OFFICER WILLIAMS #1475, E.S.U. OFFICER GALUZEVSKIY #8957, CORRECTION OFFICER FERRERO #1805, 20-CV-9840 (GHW) ORDER Defendants. GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: Defendant City of New York’s January 7, 2022 request for an extension of the stay of this case as to C.O. Aleksandr Galuzevskiy because of military service, Dkt. No. 81, is granted. This case is stayed with respect to C.O. Galuzevskiy through February 22, 2022. Defendant City of New York is instructed to submit a letter describing the status of C.O. Galuzevskiy’s military leave no later than February 23, 2022. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2022 GREGORY H. WOODS United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?