Figueroa v. City of New York et al
Filing
13
ORDER re: #12 Order on Motion for Extension of Time. After receiving an inquiry from Plaintiff's counsel about scope of the Court's January 4, 2021 order (dkt. no. 12), the Court writes to make clear that Defendants' time to respond to the complaint--i.e., to answer or otherwise respond--is extended to March 5, 2021. SO ORDERED. Peter Mormile answer due 3/5/2021. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 1/8/2021) (va)
Case 1:20-cv-10050-LAP Document 13 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SAMUEL FIGUEROA,
Plaintiff,
No. 20 Civ. 10050 (LAP)
-against-
ORDER
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE NEW
YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
and PETER MORMILLE,
Defendants.
LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge:
After receiving an inquiry from Plaintiff’s counsel about
scope of the Court’s January 4, 2021 order (dkt. no. 12), the
Court writes to make clear that Defendants’ time to respond to
the complaint--i.e., to answer or otherwise respond--is extended
to March 5, 2021.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
New York, New York
January 8, 2021
____________________________
LORETTA A. PRESKA
Senior United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?