Figueroa v. City of New York et al

Filing 13

ORDER re: 12 Order on Motion for Extension of Time. After receiving an inquiry from Plaintiff's counsel about scope of the Court's January 4, 2021 order (dkt. no. 12), the Court writes to make clear that Defendants' time to respond to the complaint--i.e., to answer or otherwise respond--is extended to March 5, 2021. SO ORDERED. Peter Mormile answer due 3/5/2021. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 1/8/2021) (va)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-10050-LAP Document 13 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SAMUEL FIGUEROA, Plaintiff, No. 20 Civ. 10050 (LAP) -against- ORDER THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, and PETER MORMILLE, Defendants. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: After receiving an inquiry from Plaintiff’s counsel about scope of the Court’s January 4, 2021 order (dkt. no. 12), the Court writes to make clear that Defendants’ time to respond to the complaint--i.e., to answer or otherwise respond--is extended to March 5, 2021. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York January 8, 2021 ____________________________ LORETTA A. PRESKA Senior United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?