Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc. et al.
Filing
250
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' BRADLEY GARLINGHOUSE AND CHRISTIAN A. LARSEN MOTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LETTERS OF REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE: This matter having arisen upon motion by Defendants Bradley Garlinghouse and Christian A. Larsen (the "Individual Defendants") for this Court to issue the Letters of Request to the Central Authorities of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Seychelles, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Malta, and it appearing that these Letters of Request are appropriate, IT IS ORDERED, that this Court shall issue the Letters of Request in the form appearing at the Individual Defendants' motion for issuance of Letters of Request for International Judicial Assistance as Exhibits 2 through 17. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 6/14/2021) (ras) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Case 1:20-cv-10832-AT-SN Document 250 Filed 06/15/21 Page 1 of 3
06/15/2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
No. 20-cv-10832 (AT) (SN)
V.
RIPPLE LABS INC.,
BRADLEY GARLINGHOUSE,
and CHRISTIAN A. LARSEN,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' BRADLEY GARLINGHOUSE AND
CHRISTIAN A. LARSEN MOTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LETTERS OF
REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE
This matter having arisen upon motion by Defendants Bradley Garlinghouse and
Christian A. Larsen (the "Individual Defendants") for this Court to issue the Letters of Request
to the Central Authorities of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the
Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of
China, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Seychelles, the Republic of Korea, and the
Republic of Malta, and it appearing that these Letters of Request are appropriate,
IT IS ORDERED, that this Court shall issue the Letters of Request in the form appearing
at the Individual Defendants' motion for issuance of Letters of Request for International Judicial
Assistance as Exhibits 2 through 17.
Dated:
j II\ 11 l
� � , 2021
Case 1:20-cv-10832-AT-SN Document 250 Filed 06/15/21 Page 2 of 3
List of Persons to Be Notified
Counsel for Bradley Garlinghouse:
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Matthew C. Solomon
Nowell D. Bamberger
2112 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, D.C. 20037
United States of America
Telephone: (202) 974-1500
Alexander J. Janghorbani
Samuel L. Levander
Lucas D. Hakkenberg
One Liberty Plaza
New York, New York 10006
United States of America
Telephone: (212) 225-2000
Counsel for Christian A. Larsen:
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Martin Flumenbaum
Michael E. Gertzman
Justin D. Ward
Kristina A. Bunting
1285 A venue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019
United States of America
Telephone: (212) 373-3000
Meredith R. Dearborn
Robin Linsenmayer
943 Steiner St.
San Francisco, CA 941 17
United States of America
Telephone: (212) 373-3000
Counsel for Ripple Labs, Inc.:
Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP
Andrew J. Ceresney
Mary Jo White
Lisa R. Somberg
Joy Guo
2
Case 1:20-cv-10832-AT-SN Document 250 Filed 06/15/21 Page 3 of 3
Christopher S. Ford
919 Third A venue
New York, NY 10022
United States of America
Telephone: (212) 909-6000
Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick: PLLC
Michael K. Kellogg
Reid M. Figel
Lillian V. Smith
George G. Rapawy
Eliana M. Pfeffer
Collin White
Bradley E. Oppenheimer
1615 M Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
United States of America
Telephone: (202) 326-7900
Counsel for the Securities and Exchange Commission:
Richard Best
Kristina Littman
Preethi Krishnamurthy
Jorge G. Tenreiro
Mark Sylvester
John 0. Enright
Daphna A. Waxman
Jon A. Daniels
200 Vesey St #400
New York, NY 10281
United States of America
(212) 336-1100
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?