Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc. et al.

Filing 250

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' BRADLEY GARLINGHOUSE AND CHRISTIAN A. LARSEN MOTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LETTERS OF REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE: This matter having arisen upon motion by Defendants Bradley Garlinghouse and Christian A. Larsen (the "Individual Defendants") for this Court to issue the Letters of Request to the Central Authorities of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Seychelles, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Malta, and it appearing that these Letters of Request are appropriate, IT IS ORDERED, that this Court shall issue the Letters of Request in the form appearing at the Individual Defendants' motion for issuance of Letters of Request for International Judicial Assistance as Exhibits 2 through 17. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 6/14/2021) (ras) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-10832-AT-SN Document 250 Filed 06/15/21 Page 1 of 3 06/15/2021 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, No. 20-cv-10832 (AT) (SN) V. RIPPLE LABS INC., BRADLEY GARLINGHOUSE, and CHRISTIAN A. LARSEN, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' BRADLEY GARLINGHOUSE AND CHRISTIAN A. LARSEN MOTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LETTERS OF REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE This matter having arisen upon motion by Defendants Bradley Garlinghouse and Christian A. Larsen (the "Individual Defendants") for this Court to issue the Letters of Request to the Central Authorities of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Seychelles, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Malta, and it appearing that these Letters of Request are appropriate, IT IS ORDERED, that this Court shall issue the Letters of Request in the form appearing at the Individual Defendants' motion for issuance of Letters of Request for International Judicial Assistance as Exhibits 2 through 17. Dated: j II\ 11 l � � , 2021 Case 1:20-cv-10832-AT-SN Document 250 Filed 06/15/21 Page 2 of 3 List of Persons to Be Notified Counsel for Bradley Garlinghouse: Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP Matthew C. Solomon Nowell D. Bamberger 2112 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, D.C. 20037 United States of America Telephone: (202) 974-1500 Alexander J. Janghorbani Samuel L. Levander Lucas D. Hakkenberg One Liberty Plaza New York, New York 10006 United States of America Telephone: (212) 225-2000 Counsel for Christian A. Larsen: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP Martin Flumenbaum Michael E. Gertzman Justin D. Ward Kristina A. Bunting 1285 A venue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 United States of America Telephone: (212) 373-3000 Meredith R. Dearborn Robin Linsenmayer 943 Steiner St. San Francisco, CA 941 17 United States of America Telephone: (212) 373-3000 Counsel for Ripple Labs, Inc.: Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP Andrew J. Ceresney Mary Jo White Lisa R. Somberg Joy Guo 2 Case 1:20-cv-10832-AT-SN Document 250 Filed 06/15/21 Page 3 of 3 Christopher S. Ford 919 Third A venue New York, NY 10022 United States of America Telephone: (212) 909-6000 Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick: PLLC Michael K. Kellogg Reid M. Figel Lillian V. Smith George G. Rapawy Eliana M. Pfeffer Collin White Bradley E. Oppenheimer 1615 M Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 United States of America Telephone: (202) 326-7900 Counsel for the Securities and Exchange Commission: Richard Best Kristina Littman Preethi Krishnamurthy Jorge G. Tenreiro Mark Sylvester John 0. Enright Daphna A. Waxman Jon A. Daniels 200 Vesey St #400 New York, NY 10281 United States of America (212) 336-1100 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?