Nisbett v. Very Great Inc.
ORDER granting 7 LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Sidney H. Stein from Douglas B. Lipsky dated 2/16/2021. Document filed by Kareem Nisbett. The teleconference is adjourned to April 30, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. So ordered. (Initial Conference set for 4/30/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Sidney H. Stein.) (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 2/16/2021) (rjm)
Case 1:21-cv-00236-SHS Document 8 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 1
AN EMPLOYMENT LAW
Douglas B. Lipsky- Partner
420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1830
New York, New York 10170
February 16, 2021
The Honorable Sidney H. Stein, U.S.D.J.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007
Nisbett v. Very Great Inc., l:21-cv-236 (SHS)
Dear Judge Stein:
This firm represents Plaintiff Kareem Nisbett in this website accessibility case
under the Americans with Disabilities Act, New York State Human Rights Law and New
York City Human Rights Law. We respectfully request an adjournment of the February
19, 2021, 11:00 a.m., Initial Pretrial Conference.
Defendant was served with the Summons and Complaint on February 8, 2021,
making its responsive pleading due on February 26. (Doc. No. 6). However, no attorney
representing the Defendant has contacted this firm nor filed a Notice of Appearance. This
is possibly because it was served via the Secretary of State of New York, as a delay
sometimes occurs between a company being served under this method and receiving
notice of being served. Because of this likelihood and to conserve judicial resources,
Plaintiff makes this request to adjourn the conference for 30 days.
This is the first request to adjourn this conference. The adjournment, if granted,
would not affect any other deadlines or conferences.
We appreciate the Court's consideration of this request.
LIPSKY LOWE LLP
s/ Douglas B. Lipsky
Douglas B. Lipsky
The teleconference is adjourned to April 30, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.
Dated: New York, New York
February 16, 2021
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?