Citgo Petroleum Corporation v. Ascot Underwriting Limited, for and on behalf of Lloyd's Syndicate 1414 et al

Filing 239

ORDER: In determining these questions, the Court requests briefing from the parties regarding (1) when President Guaid's presidency began according to Venezuelan law, including but not necessarily limited to the proper interpretation of A rticle 233 of the Venezuelan Constitution; and (2) the legal validity, legitimacy, and effect of the Venezuelan "court order" allegedly issued by the Caracas criminal court. To the extent that understanding the treatment of either ques tion under Venezuelan law will require the Court to reference or interpret Venezuelan laws, statutes, or the Venezuelan Constitution, the parties should submit English translations of the same, in addition to the original Spanish versions. The p arties' briefing on these two issues is due no later than November 17, 2023. Any replies are due no later than November 21, 2023. ( Brief due by 11/17/2023., Reply to Response to Brief due by 11/21/2023.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 11/14/2023) (tro)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-v :
:
STARSTONE INSURANCE SE, et al.,
:
:
Defendants. :
:
----------------------------------------------------------------- X
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:

USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: ________________
DATE FILED: 11/14/2023

1:21-cv-389-GHW
ORDER

The Court thanks the parties for their recent pretrial briefing at Dkt. Nos. 233, 234, 235, and
236. The Court treats the question of the legal validity, legitimacy, and effect of the Venezuelan
“court order” allegedly issued by a Caracas criminal court as a question of law reserved for the
Court. The Court additionally treats the issue of when President Guaidó’s presidency began as a
question of foreign law, to the extent that it may involve interpretation of the Venezuelan
Constitution or other Venezuelan laws. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 44.1 (describing the Court’s
determination of “an issue about a foreign country’s law” as one that “must be treated as a ruling on
a question of law”); Branch of Citibank, N.A. v. De Nevares, 74 F.4th 8, 15, n.5 (2d Cir. 2023) (“‘At
common law, the content of foreign law relevant to a dispute was treated as a question of fact.’
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 44.1, however, a court’s determination of foreign law ‘must be treated as a
ruling on a question of law.’”) (citations omitted). “[W]hile Rule 44.1 grants a district court ‘freedom
to employ fact-like procedures, including by taking written and oral testimony,’ the district court’s
determination of foreign law is a legal conclusion” for the Court to make. Kingstown Cap. Mgmt., L.P.
v. Vitek, No. 20-3406, 2022 WL 3970920, at *2 (2d Cir. Sept. 1, 2022).
In determining these questions, the Court requests briefing from the parties regarding (1)
when President Guaidó’s presidency began according to Venezuelan law, including but not

necessarily limited to the proper interpretation of Article 233 of the Venezuelan Constitution; and
(2) the legal validity, legitimacy, and effect of the Venezuelan “court order” allegedly issued by the
Caracas criminal court. To the extent that understanding the treatment of either question under
Venezuelan law will require the Court to reference or interpret Venezuelan laws, statutes, or the
Venezuelan Constitution, the parties should submit English translations of the same, in addition to
the original Spanish versions.
The parties’ briefing on these two issues is due no later than November 17, 2023. Any
replies are due no later than November 21, 2023.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 14, 2023
New York, New York

__________________________________
GREGORY H. WOODS
United States District Judge

2