Wilson v. City Of New York et al

Filing 40

ORDER granting 39 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The Application is granted. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/15/2022) (ks)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-00479-PGG Document 40 39 Filed 09/15/22 09/09/22 Page 1 of 2 HON. SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX Corporation Counsel THE CITY OF NEW YORK LAW DEPARTMENT 100 CHURCH STREET NEW YORK, N.Y. 10007 ZACHARY KALMBACH Assistant Corporation Counsel phone: (212) 356-2322 fax: (212) 356-3509 zkalmbac@law.nyc.gov September 9, 2022 VIA ECF Honorable Paul G. Gardephe United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 705 New York, New York 10007 Re: Your Honor: Rhashawn Wilson v. City of New York, et al., 21 Civ. 479 (PGG) I represent defendants City of New York and New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) Officers McQuail, Dunn and Rugg in the above-referenced matter. Defendants write to respectfully request that the Court extend their time to file their anticipated motion for summary judgment from September 22, 2022 to October 16, 2022, and extend the corresponding opposition and reply deadlines accordingly. This is defendants’ first such request. Plaintiff consents to this request. By way of background, on July 20, 2022, defendants filed a letter requesting a pre-motion conference regarding their anticipated motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 37). Plaintiff never responded thereto. On September 1, 2022, the Court issued an Order setting the following briefing schedule for defendants’ anticipated motion: (1) defendants’ initial motion papers are due September 22, 2022; (2) plaintiff’s opposition is due October 13, 2022; and (3) defendants’ reply, if any, is due October 20, 2022 (ECF No. 38). Defendants respectfully request that the Court adjust the current briefing schedule as follows: 1) defendants’ initial motion papers are due October 14, 2022; (2) plaintiff’s opposition is due November 4, 2022; and (3) defendants’ reply, if any, is due November 11, 2022. The reason for this request is that the undersigned is scheduled to begin trial before the Honorable Frederic Block in the Eastern District of New York on September 27, 2022, in a case in which this Office represents five defendant NYPD officers. See McClarin v. City of New York, et al., 16-CV-6846 (FB) (SJB). Trial is expected to last through September 30, 2022. As such, the undersigned’s schedule for September is largely full with preparing for trial as well as keeping up with other, previously scheduled deadlines and conferences in other cases. Accordingly, defendants respectfully request that the Court adjust the current briefing schedule for defendants’ anticipated Case 1:21-cv-00479-PGG Document 40 39 Filed 09/15/22 09/09/22 Page 2 of 2 motion for summary judgment as proposed supra, so as to allow the undersigned two weeks after the completion of trial to complete and serve defendants’ anticipated motion. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully submitted, cc: /s/ Zachary Kalmbach Zachary Kalmbach Assistant Corporation Counsel Special Federal Litigation Division Via ECF Ataur Raquib Sameer Nath Michael Kevin Pinkard Sim & DePaola LLP Attorneys for plaintiff September 15, 2022 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?