Perry v. Floss Bar, Inc. et al
Filing
49
ORDER: This matter is set for a telephonic status conference on February 19, 2021 at 10:00am. By no later than February 18, 2021, the parties are instructed to jointly complete and file via ECF the attached proposed Civil Case Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. ( Telephone Conference set for 2/19/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 2/16/2021) (mro)
Case 1:21-cv-00685-ER Document 49 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JOSHUA PERRY,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
– against –
21 Civ. 685 (ER)
FLOSS BAR INC, et al.,
Defendants.
Ramos, D.J.:
�is matter is set for a telephonic status conference on February 19, 2021 at 10:00am. By
no later than February 18, 2021, the parties are instructed to jointly complete and file via ECF the
attached proposed Civil Case Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order.
It is SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 16, 2021
New York, New York
Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.
Case 1:21-cv-00685-ER Document 49 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------x
Plaintiff(s),
Rev. Jan. 2012
CIVIL CASE DISCOVERY PLAN
AND SCHEDULING ORDER
- against -
Defendant(s).
CV
(ER)
-------------------------------------------------------------x
This Civil Case Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order is adopted, after consultation with
counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and 26(f):
1.
All parties [consent] [do not consent] to conducting all further proceedings before a
Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The
parties are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. (If
all parties consent, the remaining paragraphs of this form need not be completed.)
2.
This case [is] [is not] to be tried to a jury.
3.
Joinder of additional parties must be accomplished by _______________________.
4.
Amended pleadings may be filed until _____________________.
5.
Interrogatories shall be served no later than ___________________, and responses
thereto shall be served within thirty (30) days thereafter. The provisions of Local
Civil Rule 33.3 [shall] [shall not] apply to this case.
6.
First request for production of documents, if any, shall be served no later than
____________________.
7.
Non-expert depositions shall be completed by ____________________________.
a.
Unless counsel agree otherwise or the Court so orders, depositions shall not
be held until all parties have responded to any first requests for production
of documents.
b.
Depositions shall proceed concurrently.
c.
Whenever possible, unless counsel agree otherwise or the Court so orders,
non-party depositions shall follow party depositions.
Case 1:21-cv-00685-ER Document 49 Filed 02/16/21 Page 3 of 3
8.
Any further interrogatories, including expert interrogatories, shall be served no later
than _______________________.
9.
Requests to Admit, if any, shall be served no later than ______________________.
10.
Expert reports shall be served no later than ______________________.
11.
Rebuttal expert reports shall be served no later than ______________________.
12.
Expert depositions shall be completed by ______________________.
13.
Additional provisions agreed upon by counsel are attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
14.
ALL DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY ______________________.
15.
Any motions shall be filed in accordance with the Court’s Individual Practices.
16.
This Civil Case Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order may not be changed without
leave of Court (or the assigned Magistrate Judge acting under a specific order of
reference).
17.
The Magistrate Judge assigned to this case is the Hon.
18.
If, after entry of this Order, the parties consent to trial before a Magistrate Judge,
the Magistrate Judge will schedule a date certain for trial and will, if necessary,
amend this Order consistent therewith.
19.
The next case management conference is scheduled for _____________________,
at ____________. (The Court will set this date at the initial conference.)
.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: New York, New York
_______________________
_______________________________
Edgardo Ramos, U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?