Williams, Jr. v. City of New York et al

Filing 52

ORDER: This court recently received a letter from the Plaintiff in the above-captioned case. (ECF No. 51.) The letter suggests that Plaintiff intends to hire a medical expert to review his medical files. Further, Plaintiff requests that the Cour t set aside funds to pay the expert witness's fees in light of Plaintiff's IFP status (his status as a poor person under the law). It is well-held in this Circuit that "federal courts are not authorized to waive or pay witness fees o n behalf of an in forma pauperis litigant." Malik v. Lavalley, 994 F.2d 90 (2d Cir. 1993) (collecting cases). Therefore, Plaintiff's request is denied. The Court respectfully requests that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 6/4/2021) (cf) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 6/4/2021 ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff, 1:21-CV-1083 (JPC) (KHP) ORDER -againstCITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants. KATHARINE H. PARKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This court recently received a letter from the Plaintiff in the above-captioned case. (ECF No. 51.) The letter suggests that Plaintiff intends to hire a medical expert to review his medical files. Further, Plaintiff requests that the Court set aside funds to pay the expert witness’s fees in light of Plaintiff’s IFP status (his status as a poor person under the law). It is well-held in this Circuit that “federal courts are not authorized to waive or pay witness fees on behalf of an in forma pauperis litigant.” Malik v. Lavalley, 994 F.2d 90 (2d Cir. 1993) (collecting cases). Therefore, Plaintiff’s request is denied. The Court respectfully requests that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. Dated: June 4, 2021 New York, New York SO ORDERED. ________________________________ KATHARINE H. PARKER United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?