Acosta et al v. City of New York et al

Filing 36

ORDER: The Court held a hearing today in this matter, on the record and with all parties participating. At the conclusion of oral argument, the Court denied plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, see ECF Nos. 19-20, on the grounds that abstention is warranted by Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Accordingly, the parties are HEREBY ORDERED to confer and submit a schedule for the continuation of this action, including a schedule for discovery, to this Court in writing on or before April 7, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 3/31/2021) (ama)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ERIC MATOS, Plaintiff, v. 21-CV-1144 (SHS) ORDER CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL., Defendants. SIDNEY H. STEIN, U.S. District Judge. The Court held a hearing today in this matter, on the record and with all parties participating. At the conclusion of oral argument, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, see ECF Nos. 19-20, on the grounds that abstention is warranted by Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Accordingly, the parties are HEREBY ORDERED to confer and submit a schedule for the continuation of this action, including a schedule for discovery, to this Court in writing on or before April 7, 2021. Dated: New York, New York March 31, 2021

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?