Stewart et al v. Nurture, Inc.

Filing 207

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTIONS FOR ORAL ARGUMENT denying without prejudice (162) Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice (166) Letter Motion for Oral Argument; denying without prejudice (174) Motion to Strike docket entry and document (162 in 1:21-cv-01217-MKV) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Class Action Complaint. filed by Nurture, Inc., (166 in 1:21-cv-01217-MKV) LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument re Nurture's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Class Action Complaint addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Colleen C. Gulliver dated November 21, 2022. filed by Nurture, Inc., (174 in 1:21-cv-01217-MKV) MOTION to Strik e Document No. (165) Declaration of Nega Beru Submitted in Support of Defendant Nurture, LLC's Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint. filed by Susan Ray Lawson, Marie Mezile, Nicole Margiotta, Diego Galeana, Chey&# 039;na Micciche, Charlotte Willoughby, Kelly Mckeon, Laura Barbu, Hilary Paris, (178 in 1:21-cv-01217-MKV, 34 in 1:21-cv-01271-MKV, 58 in 1:21-cv-01473-MKV, 59 in 1:21-cv-01534-MKV, 65 in 1:21-cv-01882-MKV, 39 in 1:21-cv-02101-MKV, 46 in 1:21-cv -02553-MKV, 37 in 1:21-cv-03499-MKV, 65 in 1:21-cv-05344-MKV, 26 in 1:21-cv-05748-MKV, 36 in 1:21-cv-06632-MKV, 29 in 1:21-cv-06678-MKV, 28 in 1:21-cv-06861-MKV, 37 in 1:21-cv-06918-MKV, 23 in 1:21-cv-07283-MKV, 31 in 1:21-cv-08030-MKV) LETTER MOT ION for Oral Argument on Plaintiffs' Motion to Strikeon the Declaration of Nega Beru (Dkt 174) addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Lori G. Feldman dated 01/10/2023. filed by Susan Ray Lawson, Marie Mezile, Nicole Margiotta, Dieg o Galeana, Chey'na Micciche, Charlotte Willoughby, Laura Barbu, Kelly Mckeon, Hilary Paris from the record.; denying without prejudice (178) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-01217-MKV; denying without prejudice (34) Lette r Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-01271-MKV; denying without prejudice (58) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-01473-MKV; denying without prejudice (59) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-01534-MKV; denying withou t prejudice (65) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-01882-MKV; denying without prejudice (39) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-02101-MKV; denying without prejudice (46) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-02 553-MKV; denying without prejudice (37) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-03499-MKV; denying without prejudice (65) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-05344-MKV; denying without prejudice (26) Letter Motion for Oral Argu ment in case 1:21-cv-05748-MKV; denying without prejudice (36) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-06632-MKV; denying without prejudice (29) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-06678-MKV; denying without prejudice (28) Lett er Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-06861-MKV; denying without prejudice (37) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-06918-MKV; denying without prejudice (23) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-07283-MKV; denying witho ut prejudice (31) Letter Motion for Oral Argument in case 1:21-cv-08030-MKV. Upon review, Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Class Action Complaint, Plaintiffs' motion to strike the Declaration of Nega B eru, and the motions for oral argument associated therewith, are hereby DENIED without prejudice based on the apparent lack of subject matter jurisdiction as pleaded in the Consolidated Class Action Complaint. [ECF Nos. 162, 166, 174, 178; see EC F No. 157]. The Court will simultaneously enter a scheduling order to afford the parties an opportunity to be heard with respect to the existence of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close the motions pending at docket entries 162, 166, 174, and 178. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 3/27/2024) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01217-MKV et al. (tg)

Download PDF
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 3/27/2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re NURTURE BABY FOOD LITIGATION This document relates to: ALL ACTIONS 1:21-cv-01217-MKV ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND MOTIONS FOR ORAL ARGUMENT MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs bring this consolidated case individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated alleging that Defendant Nurture, Inc. failed to properly disclose the presence of heavy metals and other contaminants in its baby food, in violation of consumer protection statutes and the common law in the states in which Plaintiffs reside. [See ECF No. 157]. The Court, as it is independently obligated to do, has assessed whether it has subject matter jurisdiction in connection with this action. See Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428, 434 (2011); In re Tronox Inc., 855 F.3d 84, 95 (2d Cir. 2017); see e.g., Digitel, Inc. v. MCI Worldcom, Inc., 239 F.3d 187, 189–90 (2d Cir. 2001) (affirming the district court’s sua sponte dismissal on subject matter jurisdiction grounds); Curcio v. Abrams, No. 22-693, 2023 WL 31183, at *2 (2d Cir. Jan. 4, 2023) (summary order) (affirming the district court’s sua sponte dismissal). Upon review, Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Class Action Complaint, Plaintiffs’ motion to strike the Declaration of Nega Beru, and the motions for oral argument associated therewith, are hereby DENIED without prejudice based on the apparent lack of subject matter jurisdiction as pleaded in the Consolidated Class Action Complaint. [ECF Nos. 162, 166, 174, 178; see ECF No. 157]. The Court will simultaneously enter a scheduling order to afford the parties an opportunity to be heard with respect to the existence of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close the motions pending at docket entries 162, 166, 174, and 178. SO ORDERED. _________________________________ MARY KAY VYSKOCIL United States District Judge Date: March 27, 2024 New York, NY 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?