Ormeno v. Relentless Consulting Inc et al

Filing 25

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 24 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Relentless Consulting Inc, W Entertainment, Juan Toro, Juan Luis Moreno Luna against Victor Ormeno. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the C ourt's Opinion and Order dated January 11, 2022, defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice. See Jordan v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 91 F. Supp. 3d 491, 510 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) ("Granting leave to amend is 'futile' if a revised claim still 'could not withstand a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).'") (quoting Dougherty v. Town of N. Hempstead Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 282 F.3d 83, 88 (2d Cir. 2002)); Cortese v. Skanska Koch, Inc., 2021 WL 429971, at *18 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2021) (holding that complaint should be dismissed with prejudice where plaintiff's claims are clearly time-barred; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 1/11/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-01643-LJL Document 25 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X VICTOR ORMENO d/b/a/ KH ENTERTAINMENT, -against- Plaintiff, 21 CIVIL 1643 (LJL) JUDGMENT RELENTLESS CONSULTING INC, JUAN TORO individually d/b/a RELENTLESS AGENCY, W ENTERTAINMENT, JUAN LUIS MORENO LUNA, Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated January 11, 2022, defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice. See Jordan v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 91 F. Supp. 3d 491, 510 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) ("Granting leave to amend is 'futile' if a revised claim still 'could not withstand a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).'") (quoting Dougherty v. Town of N. Hempstead Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 282 F.3d 83, 88 (2d Cir. 2002)); Cortese v. Skanska Koch, Inc., 2021 WL 429971, at *18 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2021) (holding that complaint should be dismissed with prejudice where plaintiff's claims are clearly time-barred; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York January 11, 2022 BY: RUBY J. KRAJICK _________________________ Clerk of Court _________________________ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?