Lazar v. City of New York et al

Filing 61

ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants City of New York and Nunezramos shall raise any objection to the addition of the malicious prosecution claim by September 20, 2022. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/15/2022) (mml)

Case 1:21-cv-01748-LGS Document 61 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------X
:
SORIN LAZAR,
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-against:
:
CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
:
Defendants. :
:
-------------------------------------------------------------X

21 Civ. 1748 (LGS)
ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, the Opinion and Order dated July 26, 2022, dismissed the Second Amended
Complaint as to Defendants Cyris Jewels and The Aurora Condominium. The Plaintiff was
permitted to seek leave to replead consistent with the Opinion by filing a red-lined version of the
proposed Third Amended Complaint, showing changes from the Second Amended Complaint,
together with a letter application explaining how the proposed amended pleading cures the
deficiencies identified in the Opinion;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the proposed Third Amended Complaint and letter application
on August 17, 2022. It is hereby
ORDERED that Defendants City of New York and Nunezramos shall raise any objection
to the addition of the malicious prosecution claim by September 20, 2022.
Dated: September 15, 2022
New York, New York