Komatsu v. United States of America et al

Filing 110

ORDER: Plaintiff requests a second extension of time to respond to Defendants' motions to dismiss. See Dkt. No. 106, 108. Because Plaintiff was not prejudiced in any way by the Order striking Inter-Con's motion papers from the electro nic docket, this request is denied. The parties are directed to comply with the briefing schedule previously set forth on December 14, 2021. See Dkt. No. 100. Pursuant to that schedule, Plaintiff's response is due on February 20, 2022 and Defendants' replies are due March 7, 2022. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Raymond J Dearie on 1/11/2022) (ks) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Case 1:21-cv-01838-RD-RLM Document 110 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------- x
TOWAKI KOMATSU,
Plaintiff
- against -

ORDER
Case No. 21-CV-1838

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------- x
DEARIE, District Judge *
Plaintiff requests a second extension of time to respond to Defendants’ motions to
dismiss. See Dkt. No. 106, 108. Because Plaintiff was not prejudiced in any way by the Order
striking Inter-Con’s motion papers from the electronic docket, this request is denied.
The parties are directed to comply with the briefing schedule previously set forth on
December 14, 2021. See Dkt. No. 100. Pursuant to that schedule, Plaintiff’s response is due on
February 20, 2022 and Defendants’ replies are due March 7, 2022.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
January 11, 2022

*

/s/ Raymond J. Dearie
RAYMOND J. DEARIE
United States District Judge
Sitting by Designation

Hon. Raymond J. Dearie, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York,
sitting by designation.