Field v. Exponential Wealth Inc. et al
Filing
265
ORDER, On or before March 13, 2025, Lilling and Koblenz shall each file (i) a letter setting forth whether they continue to represent Plaintiffs, or (ii) if not, a motion to withdraw as counsel supported by satisfactory reasons for withdrawal on the eve of trial and setting forth whether or not [they assert] a retaining or charging lien. Local R. 1.4(b). SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 3/13/2025.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave on 3/10/25) (yv)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
DR. DAVID S. FIELD and HOLLY FIELD,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 21 Civ. 1990 (JGK) (SLC)
-v-
ORDER
EXPONENTIAL WEALTH INC., et al.,
Defendants.
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
On February 24, 2025, Plaintiffs notified the Court that they “have chosen to represent
[them]selves [pro se] and will no longer be represented by Mound Cotton Greengrass, Michael
Koblenz, Sara Lilling, and the law firm of Westerman, Ball and Ederer.” (ECF No. 263).
Neither Sara Lilling, Esq. nor Michael Koblenz, Esq. filed motions to withdraw as Plaintiffs’
counsel, which is required under Local Rule 1.4(b) before counsel can be discharged from their
representation in a case. Accordingly, on or before March 13, 2025, Lilling and Koblenz shall each
file (i) a letter setting forth whether they continue to represent Plaintiffs, or (ii) if not, a motion
to withdraw as counsel supported by “satisfactory reasons for withdrawal” on the eve of trial and
setting forth “whether or not [they assert] a retaining or charging lien.” Local R. 1.4(b).
Dated:
New York, New York
March 10, 2025
SO ORDERED.
_________________________
SARAH L. CAVE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?