Cameron v. Clark et al

Filing 8

BAR ORDER UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g): While Plaintiff was a prisoner, he filed three or more actions or appeals that are deemed strikes because they were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Because Plaintiff has not shown cause why the bar order should not be imposed, Plaintiff is barred from filing future civil actions IFP in this Court while he is a prisoner unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. P laintiff is warned that the submission of frivolous documents may result in the imposition of additional sanctions, including monetary penalties. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651. The Court denies Plaintiff's request to proceed IFP and dismisses the amended complaint without prejudice under the PLRA's "three- strikes" rule. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies u nder 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 6/7/21) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
GILBERT CAMERON,
Plaintiff,
-againstDA DARCEL CLARK; ADA BRUCE
BIRNS; ADA DAWN GUGLIELMO; DA
ROBERT T. JOHNSON; HON. NICOLAS
IACOVETTA; HON. MARGARET L.
CLANCY; ADA CLARA H. SALZBERG;
LETITIA JAMES, NEW YORK STATE
ATTORNEY GENERAL,

21-CV-2383 (LTS)
BAR ORDER UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

Defendants.
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:
Plaintiff, who is currently detained in the Otis Bantum Correctional Center on Rikers
Island, filed this action pro se and seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). On May 7, 2021, the
Court noted that, while a prisoner, Plaintiff had filed three or more actions or appeals that were
dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted,
and it ordered Plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why he should not be barred under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g) from filing future civil actions IFP in this Court while he is a prisoner. Plaintiff
filed an affirmation on May 27, 2021, but the affirmation does not provide sufficient reason not
to impose the above-described bar order. Plaintiff instead repeats his allegations that Defendants
maliciously prosecuted him in connection with his 2010 Bronx County conviction.
BAR ORDER
While Plaintiff was a prisoner, he filed three or more actions or appeals that are deemed
strikes because they were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim on
which relief may be granted. Because Plaintiff has not shown cause why the bar order should not

be imposed, Plaintiff is barred from filing future civil actions IFP in this Court while he is a
prisoner unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Plaintiff is warned that
the submission of frivolous documents may result in the imposition of additional sanctions,
including monetary penalties. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651.
The Court denies Plaintiff’s request to proceed IFP and dismisses the amended complaint
without prejudice under the PLRA’s “three-strikes” rule. 1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on
the docket.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would
not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See
Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 7, 2021
New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN
Chief United States District Judge

1

Plaintiff may commence a new action by paying the filing fees. If Plaintiff does so, that
complaint will be reviewed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which requires the Court to dismiss any
civil rights complaint from a prisoner if it “(1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune
from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b).

2