Rosario-Santiago v. Pliler

Filing 26

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 25 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations in favor of W. S. Pliler against Luis J. Rosario-Santiago. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 28, 2022, the Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety and Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is denied. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the orde r would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 7/29/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------X
LUIS J. ROSARIO-SANTIAGO,
Petitioner,

21 CIVIL 3202 (JPC)(RWL)

JUDGMENT

-againstMR. W.S. PLILER, Warden,

Respondent.
-----------------------------------------------------------X

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons
stated in the Court's Order dated July 28, 2022, the Report and Recommendation is adopted in its
entirety and Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is denied.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be
taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for an appeal. Cf. Coppedge
v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed.
Dated: New York, New York
July 29, 2022

BY:

RUBY J. KRAJICK
_________________________
Clerk of Court
_________________________
Deputy Clerk