Velez v. City of New York et al

Filing 34

ORDER: If Plaintiff fails to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 29) on or before February 8, 2023, Plaintiff will forfeit the right to contest the Motion to Dismiss, and the Court will consider the motion unopposed. ( Responses due by 2/8/2023) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 1/18/2023) (ate)

Case 1:21-cv-03444-JPO Document 34 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JIMMY VELEZ,
Plaintiff,
21-CV-3444 (JPO)
-vORDER
CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
Defendant.

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Jimmy Velez initiated this action when, through counsel, he filed the instant
Complaint on April 19, 2021. (See Dkt. No. 1.) Service on Defendants occurred on August
10, 2021. (See Dkt. No. 7.) On June 1, 2022, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint.
(See Dkt. No. 29.) However, to date, Plaintiff has failed to respond to that motion.
If Plaintiff fails to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 29) on or before
February 8, 2023, Plaintiff will forfeit the right to contest the Motion to Dismiss, and the Court
will consider the motion unopposed.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 18, 2023
New York, New York
____________________________________
J. PAUL OETKEN
United States District Judge