Chowdhury v. Veon Ltd. et al

Filing 109

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 108 Order in favor of Veon Ltd. against Nayeem A. Chowdhury. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 18, 2023, the docket reflects that Plaintiff di d not file a second amended complaint by May 5, 2023. Instead, by letter dated May 17, 2023, over two years after this case was first filed, he asked the Court to allow him additional time of unspecified length to engage legal counsel. Dkt. 105. T hat request, which was not filed forty-eight hours before his deadline to file a second amended complaint, as is required by 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, but was instead filed nearly two weeks after the de adline, identifies no extraordinary circumstance that would justify granting a further extension. The request is therefore denied and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, dismissing this case without prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 5/18/2023) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (km)

Case 1:21-cv-03527-JPC-RWL Document 109 Filed 05/18/23 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------X
NAYEEM A. CHOWDHURY,
-against-

Plaintiff,

21 CIVIL 3527 (JPC)(RWL)

JUDGMENT

VEON LTD. et al.,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------X

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons
stated in the Court's Order dated May 18, 2023, the docket reflects that Plaintiff did not file a
second amended complaint by May 5, 2023. Instead, by letter dated May 17, 2023, over two
years after this case was first filed, he asked the Court to allow him additional time of
unspecified length to engage legal counsel. Dkt. 105. That request, which was not filed fortyeight hours before his deadline to file a second amended complaint, as is required by 3.B of the
Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, but was instead filed nearly two weeks
after the deadline, identifies no extraordinary circumstance that would justify granting a further
extension. The request is therefore denied and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants,
dismissing this case without prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed.
Dated: New York, New York
May 18, 2023

RUBY J. KRAJICK
_________________________
Clerk of Court
BY:

_________________________
Deputy Clerk