Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
ORDER OF SERVICE & SCHEDULING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASE: This case has been referred to me for a report and recommendation. Plaintiff has brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of a denial of social security disability benefits. This Order supersedes all prior scheduling orders in this action. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and has been granted approval to proceed in forma pauperis, the Plaintiff does not need to serve the summons and complaint in the manner required by Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or 20 C.F.R. § 423.1. Rather, the Clerk of Court shall notify the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York o f the filing of this pro se case, for which the filing fee has been waived. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully requested to send a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff. Once the Civil Division of the United States Atto rney's Office for the Southern District of New York (or alternatively the Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration ("SSA")), on behalf of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner"), enters an appearance, the Commissioner will have 90 days from the date of the appearance to file the Electronic Certified Administrative Record (the "Administrative Record"); as further set forth herein. The Clerk of Court i s respectfully directed to notify the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York of the filing of this pro se case, for which the filing fee has been waived, and send a copy of this Order to the Pro Se Plaintiff by either certified mail or by email if Plaintiff has consented to electronic service. Electronic Certified Administrative Record due by 7/27/2021. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 4/28/2021) (mro) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Commissioner of Social Security,
ORDER OF SERVICE & SCHEDULING
ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASE
21-CV-3589 (GHW) (KHP)
KATHARINE H. PARKER, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case has been referred to me for a report and recommendation. Plaintiff has
brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of a denial of social security
disability benefits. This Order supersedes all prior scheduling orders in this action.
Service of the Summons and Complaint
Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and has been granted approval to proceed in
forma pauperis, the Plaintiff does not need to serve the summons and complaint in the manner
required by Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or 20 C.F.R. § 423.1. Rather, the
Clerk of Court shall notify the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New
York of the filing of this pro se case, for which the filing fee has been waived. The Clerk of
Court is also respectfully requested to send a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff.
Answering the Complaint and Filing the Administrative Record
Once the Civil Division of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of
New York (or alternatively the Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration
(“SSA”)), on behalf of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), enters an
appearance, the Commissioner will have 90 days from the date of the appearance to file the
Electronic Certified Administrative Record (the “Administrative Record”).
Alternatively, once the Commissioner has made an appearance, the Commissioner will
have 60 days to file a motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff will have 30 days to oppose the
motion to dismiss, and the Commissioner must reply within 7 days. If no motion to dismiss is
filed, the following schedule shall be in effect.
Mandatory Settlement Process
The parties shall engage in reasonable good faith settlement negotiations to resolve the
matter, according to the schedule set forth below. The purpose of this requirement is to
encourage the parties to engage in the early identification of cases that might be amenable to
resolution before significant counsel and judicial resources are expended, and to ensure
prompt handling of Plaintiff’s complaint. Within 45 days of the filing of the Administrative
Record, one of the following actions shall occur:
The parties shall electronically file a stipulation dismissing, remanding, or
otherwise resolving the case; or
The parties shall electronically file a joint letter advising the Court that
the parties have been unable to resolve the case and are proceeding to
prepare the Joint Stipulation described in section V below.
Any stipulation entered between the parties including, but not limited to, a remand to
the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings must be approved by the assigned
district judge, unless the parties consent to the undersigned’s jurisdiction over the case for all
purposes as discussed further in section VI. The parties are advised that a remand to the
Commissioner for further proceedings is not necessarily a final disposition of the case, and
Plaintiff may be entitled to seek further review of any additional proceedings before the
Joint Stipulation (in lieu of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings)
If the parties are unable to resolve the matter after the exchange discussed above, the
Court directs that, rather than proceed in the usual fashion in this District, the parties prepare a
Joint Stipulation as described below. The Court’s decision in this case will be made on the basis
of the pleadings, the Administrative Record, and the Joint Stipulation filed by the parties. In
accordance with Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court will determine
which party is entitled to judgment under the standards set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
The parties shall cooperate in preparing the Joint Stipulation, and sanctions may be
imposed for any failure to cooperate. A Joint Stipulation that is not signed by both parties may
be rejected and returned to the parties. A Joint Stipulation that is electronically filed but not
prepared in the manner required by this Scheduling Order may be stricken, in which case the
parties will be required to cure the defects by filing an Amended Joint Stipulation.
Content of Joint Stipulation
The Joint Stipulation shall include a brief summary of the procedural history, a
statement of the facts, a statement of the disputed issues, the parties’ contentions with respect
to each disputed issue, and the parties’ statements of the relief requested. Any issue not raised
in the Joint Stipulation may be deemed to have been waived. The Court is familiar with the
standard of review and the sequential evaluation process, so the parties should avoid
boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards. Rather, the parties should focus on
applying relevant and controlling legal authority to the facts germane to each disputed issue.1
When citing relevant cases, statutes, regulations, Social Security Rulings, medical and
vocational reference sources, or other legal authority to support their legal arguments, the
parties shall provide complete and accurate citations to the portions of those authorities relied
upon. The parties shall also specify the evidence upon which they rely to support their
contentions, and provide accurate page citations to the Administrative Record for all evidence
relied upon [i.e., “R. at ___”]. In addition, all medical terminology (including medical
conditions, diagnoses, procedures, tests, anatomical references, and pharmaceuticals) shall be
defined in terms understandable to a layperson, preferably by citation to a medical dictionary
or other standard reference work. The parties may not supplement the record beyond the
definition of technical terms.
Form of Joint Stipulation
The Joint Stipulation shall be prepared in the following format:
Summary of Procedural History
The Commissioner shall provide Plaintiff a statement of the course of proceedings of
this matter before the Social Security Administration and any previous proceedings in the
federal courts, including citations to the page number(s) of the transcript or the docket number
of the court file at which each decision by the ALJ, the Appeals Council, or a federal court can
be found. The statement shall also include a substantive summary of the ALJ’s opinion.
Joint Stipulated Statement of Facts
The Commissioner shall provide Plaintiff with a statement of all facts which
Commissioner will rely on to support the Commissioner’s position as to each disputed issue
with citations to the Administrative Record. It is helpful to the Court if the facts in the
treatment records are stated chronologically, although it may be necessary in complicated
records to state the facts under subheadings, such as Physical Impairments or Mental
Impairments. The relevant medical history should be written in plain English and any medical
terms should be defined. It is also helpful to the Court if the professionals whose records or
The parties should cite only controlling case authority, i.e., decisions of the United States Supreme Court or the
Second Circuit Court of Appeals. If there is no controlling authority, decisions of other courts may be cited.
testimony are part of the record relied upon by the parties are identified by their title or area of
expertise, for example, M.D., chiropractor, or vocational expert.
After the Commissioner serves the Plaintiff with its version of the Joint Stipulation, the
Plaintiff may then add to the Commissioner’s statement of facts by including any additional
facts on which the Plaintiff will rely to support the Plaintiff’s position as to each disputed issue.
Any new facts must be inserted in the chronologically appropriate place in the Commissioner’s
statement of facts.
If the Plaintiff objects to a statement of fact set forth by the Commissioner, the parties
must confer in a good-faith effort to resolve the objection. If the parties are not able to resolve
the objection, the parties may state objections to particular facts in appropriate footnotes.
Statement of Disputed Issues
The Commissioner shall identify and frame, in a neutral fashion, each of the disputed
issues raised by Plaintiff as the grounds for reversal and/or remand and as previously discussed
with the Plaintiff during the Mandatory Settlement Process. [For example: “Issue No. 1 –
Whether the ALJ properly evaluated Plaintiff’s subjective complaints of pain”]. If the Plaintiff
disagrees or believes the issues are not correctly or fully stated, Plaintiff will provide
clarification of the issues. The Court will not consider any grounds for reversal that are not set
forth in the Statement of Disputed Issues.
Issues and Contentions
a. Issue No. 1 [The heading shall conform to the first issue listed in the
Statement of Disputed Issues.]
i. Plaintiff’s Contentions Regarding Issue No. 1 [Plaintiff shall
concisely set forth his or her contentions (including citations to the page(s) of the
Administrative Record where cited evidence is found, complete citations to relevant legal
authority, and definitions of medical terminology).]
ii. Commissioner’s Contentions Regarding Issue No. 1 [The
Commissioner shall concisely set forth her contentions (including citations to the page(s) of the
Administrative Record where cited evidence is found, complete citations to relevant legal
authority, and clear definitions of medical terminology).]
b. Issue No. 2, etc. [Repeat the foregoing as needed.]
a. Plaintiff’s statement of relief requested.
b. The Commissioner’s statement of relief requested.
Schedule for Preparation and Filing of Joint Stipulation
The Joint Stipulation shall be prepared and electronically filed according to the following
Within 90 days after the Administrative Record has been served and
filed, counsel for the Commissioner shall deliver to a draft of the Commissioner’s portions of
the Joint Stipulation to Plaintiff (prepared as described in section V(B)). The Commissioner’s
counsel shall provide Plaintiff with a printed copy of its portions of the Joint Stipulation and a
computer-readable copy on a diskette, thumb-drive or via e-mail. The draft shall comply with
the format and content requirements set forth elsewhere in this Order.
Within 30 days thereafter, Plaintiff shall provide to counsel for the
Commissioner Plaintiff’s portions of the Joint Stipulation and shall deliver a printed and
computer-readable copy on a diskette, thumb drive or via e-mail to counsel for the
Commissioner.2 If Plaintiff is requesting remand for the consideration of new evidence,
Plaintiff also shall provide a description of the new evidence, along with copies of any
documentary evidence, upon which Plaintiff relies.
Within 14 days thereafter, counsel for the Commissioner shall
incorporate into the Joint Stipulation any reply that the Commissioner wishes to make and shall
deliver a completed copy of the Joint Stipulation signed by counsel for the Commissioner to
Plaintiff for review and signature. Plaintiff may not raise new issues at this time. Plaintiff must
sign the Joint Stipulation within 7 days of receiving it from the Commissioner and return a
signed copy to counsel for the Commissioner within those 7 days for electronic filing with the
Unless otherwise ordered, the issues presented in the Joint Stipulation
will be deemed submitted for decision without oral argument.
Requests for extensions of the deadlines set by this scheduling order may
be granted by the Court, but only if made at least 3 days in advance of the deadline and good
cause is provided for the request. Wherever possible, an extension request should be made in
the form of a proposed stipulation and order. The parties are expected to reasonably
cooperate with each other.
The Court recognizes that differing word-processing platforms may make incorporation of the entire Joint
Stipulation into a single electronic document difficult. If the parties do not use the same word-processing
platform, the parties may break the Joint Stipulation into different sections on different pages as necessary.
Consent to Decision by Magistrate Judge Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)
The parties shall advise the Court as to whether they jointly consent to decision of this
action by a United States Magistrate Judge (that is, the undersigned), pursuant to the consent
form available on the Southern District website at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/consentto-proceed-before-us-magistrate-judge. If both parties consent, they should complete
counterparts of the form and return it to the assigned district judge for approval, with a copy to
my chambers. If either or both parties do not consent, counsel for Plaintiff shall report to
chambers that the parties do not consent, without indicating any particular party’s consent or
non-consent. This Order is not meant to interfere in any way with the parties’ absolute right to
decision by a United States District Judge but is merely an attempt at preserving scarce judicial
resources and reminding the parties of their option pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Plaintiff shall notify the Court, in writing, whether the parties consent no later than the
date by which the Joint Stipulation is filed.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to notify the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the
Southern District of New York of the filing of this pro se case, for which the filing fee has been
waived, and send a copy of this Order to the Pro Se Plaintiff by either certified mail or by
email if Plaintiff has consented to electronic service.
April 28, 2021
New York, New York
KATHARINE H. PARKER
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?